Demonocracy - Deep State Deep Shit

by marco_hanuman
aka morton_h
the blogger

Demonocracy, another one of those multidimensional words, that for the purpose of the day is necessary to describe multidimensional madness.

The cracy part of the word is of course greek and means governed by. And since the government has gone mad, we ought to spell it demonocrazy. The mono is due to the fact, that the Western globalist oligarcy sees itself as a monolith, a mono culture, a monopoly in a monopolar world governed by money and monsters.

Where does the demon slip in? Through the back door, of course. And sometimes even through the front door, if it happens to be invited. But why bother talk about demons in politics, and is it some sort of analogy, through which we are seeking to understand evil? The answer is yes and no. Yes, because we have to use unusual words to understand and describe an unusual degree of the now usual evil, that rules in this World. No, because the word describes a very real phenomenon.

It has been known for a long time, that the Powers That Be or at least certain parts of the establishment and Upper Echelon are involved in black magic rituals, satanism, human sacrifice and ritual murders, pedophilia, controlled and artificial homosexuality and different kinds of weird blood rituals including the drinking of childrens blood.

If you for some reason never have come across this information, your first thoughts may be: what is this guy talking about?But in that case it is about time, you did. As said: this is very real, and there is enough consistant and valid information out there to form opinions about it. 

 

While people in our time have the firm belief, that their rational, materialistic world has expelled all demons as mere superstition, the socalled ruling elite of the World seems to believe otherwise - being on their side very content, that people believe, that they should not believe in such rubbish, therefore making it go-under-the-radar -able.

Maybe we should invent a new word here: substition, reverse superstition. The superstitious person cuts off a rational explanation in favour of a lofty etherical one. The substituous person denies the possibility of non-material entities and powers thus giving these entities free play.

Now, whether demons as such do exist or not, is actually irrelevant. What is important is, that the ruling class weirdos believe in them or at least perform according to these beliefs. We cannot know for sure, whether they themselves always experience supernatural entities or just do their weirdo-shit to have weirdo-sex and have psychopathic blood-taste-satisfactions.

The cult of human sacrifice is ancient, and I have described it extensively in various blogs - unfortunately only in Danish:

Den sataniske verdensorden

Den Døende Gud og Kabbalah

Sort magi

Den okkulte baggrund for kapitalisme

Man pisser ikke ustraffet på guderne

I can recommend reading them even in Google translation, since it will give you a jump ahead in the understanding of this admittedly strange topic.

Now, why would the globalist ruling class be into this stuff? The simple answer is, that they are following and venerating an ancient tradition of secrecy and occult knowledge kalled Kabbalah (+ a host of other names) that has worked for them though millennia. And why deviate from a practice, that has worked for such a vaste amount of time and still works?

Now again, what is this entity called Kabbalah? Is it evil in itself to seek knowledge into the mysteries of the Universe? The answer isno.The problem of our civilisation is, that obtaining knowledge of the Universe and its workflow, so to speak, gives you access to power. And with power in sight, the attraction is immensely strong for people seeking various forms of power without having obtained the necessary degree of spiritual and ethical developement in order for them not to damage other people, and - which they totally forget - themselves.

Kabbalah is described as the 5'th level in the Judaic tradition, only accessible to the initiated priesthood. It turns out to be the 'tribe' of Levi, the Levites. Should we use a term of our time, we would call them the Deep State of the ancient world.

Or the Atonists.

Or the Hyksos, the Shepherds, that developed techiches for herding people like livestock, cattle and sheep.

Or the worshippers ofThe Dying God.

Or prior to that the worshippers of the Black Mother, Kali, that were kicked out of Dravidia, the ancient India for sacrificing human beings.

Or the worshippers of Ba'al.

Or the Red Edom, the tribe of Esau, that expelled from the Middle East wandered through Persia and settled and integrated i Khazaria.

Or the Khazariansthat fled to Poland and spread into Europe.

Or the Khazarian mafia, that is known today as the Zionists.

Or the affiliates of the k-mob, that just fancy hanging out with the power-perverts.

It turns out, that this group of people has been expelled from ALL the places on Earth, where they have settled through the ages. When people found out, to what extend and in which way their parasitic nature expressed itself, the response was always: Get rid of these people, now!The ancient Indians did so, the Egyptians did so (described in the Old Testament as the Exodus), the Palestinians aka the original israelites did so, even the Romans did so, the Russians did so, and later almost every nation of Europe did so. But these parasites don't give up, do they? So with Cromwell, the Khazarian usurers and parasites crept in through the backdoor and has dwelled there ever since. Today we know them under the names of Central Banking System and Zionism.

Questions

Are we just talking about Jews here? The Hell, NO! We are talking about a parasitic entity, the Demon from the Desert, the Cult of the Dying God, that has possessed the Jewish people. Jews should be the first to identify their parasite, that by the way doesn't give a damn about Jews, being this very parasite, that has utilized, capitalized, holocausted, holywoodized and perverted-sodomized the Jewish people. This parasite is a body snatcher, and you, the Jews have been its willing body. I say to you: free your mind and free your body! Ask yourself: what did this creepmean, when it described you as Gods chosen people? This 'god' meant, that you were casted for a millennia long pre-Hollywood production as an instrumentfor the Dying God. For God's sake - if we dare to use this term any longer? - get rid of this demon, this nightmare piggybagging on your behalf.

Do you even know, why the State of Israel was created in a land in an unfriendly desert with Jews living all over Europe and USA hated by no oneat that time in a state of wealth, prosperity and acceptance?

Have you pondered on the strangeness of the ADL daily crying out loud of your terrible sufferings due to antisemitism, when you have lived in USA for 400 years in total happiness and total acceptance without any pogrom taking place?

Ask yourself, who are these people driving the show of eternal victim role and to which purpose? What is antisemitism, by the way?

Maybe start with the question: what is a semite?

Have you ever studied your own history?

Why do you think, that the real worshippers of the Jewish religion - your know the men with hats and curly hair - do notregognize the State of Israel and do not believe that Iran/Persia should be nuked after the forthcoming election?

Why don't you socalled Jews do a genuine piece of homework and find out, whether you actually area people or just a social construct, as the Jewish school of sociology called Culture Marxism (the Frankfurt School) promotes?

These and a couple of hundred questions need to be answered. I could give you the answers, but this is not how it works. If you are the socalled children of a (mentally sick) entity that calls himself God, it is about time, you grew up to this fact and ... grew up. Since noone can be grown up, you have to do it yourself. Meanwhile the World is now slowly but surely growing up to this dark truth. One may put it like this: do the necessary Exorcismon yourself or experience another Exodus. Free yourself from the Demon and become once again this proud people with moral highground. Or let yourself be buttfucked by the zionists till your buttholes become as big as the tunnel under the English Channel.

Now why go out of this string? For the simple reason, that the zionists are the contemporary version of this millennia old phenomenon. And what does that mean, what does that include? It includes the perversion of human beings in order to weaken and controll them. Once weakened and compromized, any person in the vicinity of power will danse to the tune of the Pipes of Power. This is why, I say that the actual existence of demonic entities, and whether you and I believe in them or not, is irrelevant, since the perversion of the human beings seeking power is the point.

Case study: The Clintons

Very resently, information has come out to a broader public through the WikiLeaks about the activities in this obscure, perverted genre with the Clintons. The Rodham family is known as a bloodline of black magic practitioners, so no wonder, that their daughter would be into that also.

So. The Clintons have now been shown to be the regular customers of a very sleezy travel agency, The Lolita Express. Is was run by this pervert millionaire called Jeff Epstein. The customers got onto airplanes to the Bahamas and on the way and on location there they would have sex with underaged youngsters. It was organized pedophilia. They did this not only once but a dozen times.

Although certain police departments in the States are corrupt themselves, the NYPD actually does a good job in tracking pedophiles, and through this work Bill and Hill are now in their archives. Also the FBI knows about this, but stood back in the first round. Someone from the Deep State aparently warned them to proceed due to the election. BUT, which is absolutely fabulous, Hillary Clinton being sure about her invincibility, her immunity and total backup from the Globalist Deep State, that she and her husband serve, then had the nerves to offend the director of the FBI, James Comey. That may very well be a serious mistake. Although the FBI in many ways also is a corrupt organ for the Deep State, you do not offend its director in his face without consequenses. Now the case is reopened. And not only reopened, also extended with a lot more of the deep state deep shit, that these perverts are in.

Now Hillary Clinton will not only be charged with obstruction of justice by lying to the prosecutors of the FBI. She will also be charged with pedophilia, sex with minors, and assorted issues. Bill Clinton might be brought up on certain charges. Insiders among veterans in the intelligens communities are well aware, that the activities of the Clintons never stopped, and together with WikiLeaks they are now commenting on it and adding to it.

What is the essence of the deep state deep shit? It is rather simple, yet very powerful. And scary. When you once, just once in your life and career as a politician or other kind of person seeking power have given in to strange and weird pleasures offered to you by people with real powers, these people OWN YOU! for the rest of your life. They know, and you know, that just one step in the wrong direction, just one moment of disobedience will cost you your career, your name or even your life. Normally character assassinations are enogh in this world, and the shame and the extermination from the glamourous society will be enough. But since you are in possession of insider information, your life is also threatened. You might speak out and compromize the whole Cabal, so you may just end up taking your own live (if you get the hint here?). Or as we say: by being suicided. The is a mafia word for that: Omertá. If you break the silence you and your dog and your wife and your children and your old mother are: dead meat!Internal terror.

So the Clintons are now being put directly in contact with exposed criminals and members of satanic cults. Epstein (pedophile ring), Weiner (pedophile), Podesta (demonic worship including nasty stuff with blood and children). Bill has written in a biography on his early years how he practiced woodoo and enjoyed being posessed by spirits. They hang around in Haiti, where children have gone missing - plus billions of dollars, stolen from the Haitians for the rebuild after the hurricane and ending up in the Clinton foundation, but that is another story allthough it is all part of the same deep state deep shit.

The dark trend of hidden history

It has become rather difficult to deny, that these things are going on. The Catholic Church has been deeply infected with it. The British Royal Family as well - just say the name of Prince Charles' merry friend Jimmi Saville. The murder of Princess Diana was highly ritualized. And why haven't we seen more high level prosecutions of people from the establishment? Because the whole system is so infected, that investigations coming too close to the big fish will be stopped. Which is why the Clintons has not been convicted life sentenses or even capital punishment till now. Only one fully exposed branch of the Clinton crime syndicate should be enough for that.

It has been revealed through many sources, how homosexuality is forced upon initiates of freemasonic lodges. Especially delicious are the rituals of the Skull & Bones at Yale University. They go even into necrophilia. Almost all top politicians in England and USA are involved in some sort of secret society. And to do a career i The City of London you have to be a member of a lodge, an Inn or a society.

The American military had an official satanic chaplain by the name of Michael Aquino, taught personally by Anton Lavey, founder of The Church of Satan. His special task was to do experiments in demonic warfare. And remember, the CIA as part of the MK Ultra program would experiment with anything, that had the potential of destroying and controlling people, including all sorts of occult practices, drugs, poisons, electronics.

Remember how the nazis had equal things going with supernatural and esoteric stuff and in their research went deep into that area in order to create weapons. The Thule Society, The Vril Society, the Schutzstafel of Heinrich Himmler was build like a Knights Templar-style order. And why was the Americans so eager to get into Iraq? As we know it wasn't for WMD's that they knew, wasn't there. For oil? For destabilisation? Of course. But it turns out, that they were very interested in plundering the Iraqi museums for ancient technology. The kabalists returning to Babylon, where it all started, it seems.

The revolutionaries are always occultists. The Jacobites of the French Revolution were Frankists and Jesuits and Illuminati. The 5'th colonne of the Russian Revolution were freemasons. It was the Grand Orleans Lodge that started the 1st World War by engaging anarchists in the Balkans. And the network of Edward VII was the spiderweb for his plan for destroying two Empires - both with members of his own family as heads! It was Jewish freemasons, Dönmeh, The Young Turks that carried out the subversion of the Ottoman Empire - and participated in the Armenian genocide. The Muslim Brotherhood is a freemasonic organisation. And again: The Jesuits, do not forget the Jesuits, the largest uniform order and secret society with the strictest disciplin and control of its members in the world. The Society of Jesus, my bare ass! I don't think, that Jesus is the real name of their demon!

It can be discussed, whether these lodges and secret societies are just clothings of secrecy, hiding places for the power mongerers. This is very true, of course, but not the full explanation. For these people, power is a kind of spiritual drug, highly addictive. Once caught and infected with it, you rarely get free of it again. The societies, or cults as they really are, operate both by fear and by reward. Power people get high, they get an orgasm from the performance of power - while at the same time being shit scared of losing their reward and being punished, if they step outside the circle.

---------- o ----------

We shall see very soon, whether the White House once again will be inhabited by demonic worshippers, perverts, mafiosi. And as senior FBI and CIA members, that have spoken out about Mrs. Clinton and her whole being: She is the embodiment of Antichrist!

Freedom Perversion

by morton_h, the blogger 

This is a difficult subject. It is about the perversion of our language, especially the core words and core values that make up our whole view of the world and ourselves.

 

An assault has taken place. It is an assault on Nature and thereby Human Nature. A Human Being is regarded, treated and educated as either an animal, a machine or a ressource and caught up in a strange prison. This is why the subject is difficult. A human being is set free from the natural bonds and obligations of his nature. A human being is free to do things, he would never do in a society, where people lived according to the rules of nature. But at the same time a human being is a slave of this big machine that has been built around him. 

A fish doesn't know that it lives in water, before it is pulled out of the water. The prison of perverted freedom is all around us, and most people have no clue of why they have this feeling of unease, suppressed angst or numbness. They don't know why they are obese, abusive and always want to buy stuff. They don't know what is going on in the world, why wars and poverty is the new natural. They don't know why they get sick and why food and water and air no longer is, what it used to be and should be. They don't know why rivers of shit seem to pour out of the media, and why the people in powerful positions, that were supposed to act in their interest are making youact in theirinterest and as though is was in your own and your fellow countrymens interest. They don't know why they are not allowed to mention, question and have answers to certain things. So they have long ago stopped thinking certain things. 

But they do feel the unease. This means that there is a piece of hope, that they - or at least their descendants - someday will say: enough! and will start to want more than this perversion of a human society. This fact may also be the reason, why those that created the society - and it did not create itself, sorry to say - today seem to be more interested in creating a human machine than hearding a human animal. Animals can be fenced and held in fear, but when the moment comes, they will break ouf of the fence and take back their nature.

Let's review some aphorisms from the former blogpost. 

Free Newspeak:
Free Speech - when those in power may insult those who cannot defend themselves while YOUare supposed to shut up

Free Trade - the freedom of BigBizz to dictate the rules to peoples and nations

Free Bar - NB! only for syndicates, cartels, corporations, bankers, globalists and sycophants - with YOUpaying the bill

Free Press - non existing

Free-Dom - heard about it somewhere 

Free, then, means something else now that what our forefathers meant. 

Free from responsibility.

Free from conscience.

Free from empathy.

Free from logic and critical thinking.

Freedom is as non-sense as Human Rights. The same people, that perverted the former, invented the latter. Also former blogpost.

Freedom is not our birth right. But when noone stops us from living according to our nature, the freedom of Nature will be given to us by Nature itself. Not 'for free', because then we will eventually start acting out certain limits to our behaviour towards others and to Nature. We will regain respect for a world in balance, and abundance will re-emerge.

Now, you may want to object to this in basically two ways.
Ordbog over nysprog

The first objection

A Darwinist, a Liberal, a Culture Marxist, a Puritan or a Nihilist - and I say that these 'isms' are part of the same overall philosophy of the rulers of the world - will object to it by claiming, that the human being is basically evil and aggessive in his nature and that his need for someone to tell him what to do and a whole bunch of rules, regulations and management to go with it.

This elitist philosophy is basically bullshit and bunkum. A foul piece on nonsense does not become less foul by being repeated over-and-over-again. How often have we not heard this? It is nothing else than a way of ex-cusing the motivs and deeds of the self-proclaimed rulers of the world so they won't be a-cused. People have bought into this philosophy, because they have been traumatized generation after generation by the constant wars, that were never theirwars, but the wars of their rulers. Every time someone tried to claim the basic goodness, ability to peaceful co-existense and the sovereign nature of humans, some screwed up dumb-ass or willing agent of the powers-that-shouldn't-be would instantly step up and shoot down the claim by saying: But look at how people have been killing each other for centuries and millennia. They clearly have to be kept in strict ties, since people by nature are so eeevil!

What people?, though, was always the missing number in the equation. When a ruling elite consists of a majority of psychopaths, the last thing they want to hear is the word: psychopath. Everyone else are the evil ones and the potential psychos.

Darwinism is the pseudo-scientific ideology concocted by the British ruling class to excuse their aggressive, imperialistic plunder of the world by claiming, that it is 'natural'. It describes nature as one big aggressive war. In reality nature is a system of co-existing organisms, that complement and supplement nature in endless ways. The Darwinist concept of nature as a monstrous, self-devouring creature is non less than a psychological projection of the highly disturbed minds of this ruling class.

Liberalism in its later stages went hand in hand with Darwinism. We see the advanced results of Liberalism in the predatory, monopolistic, Crony Capitalism which is basically one Big War in the realm of business, finance and economics. And there is a direct connection between financial wars and killing-wars. It is the same perverted mindset that is behind both, and to no surprise we always see the exact same people promoting and performing both.

The Puritans created the British way of thinking. It is the mindset of the Protestants (financed by non less that the Venetians, that created the City of London) who created the whole basis for Industrialism. To be a willing labourer in the industrial age, it took a special kind of mindset, where you willingly gave up your natural freedom for a scrap of bread - while all the time dreaming of your lost freedom.

To encapsulate this dream, Marxism and socialism were created - dare we say as the new opium for the masses. It was created no other place than in London, which is not a coincidence. Give them a dream, but do never ever fulfill the dream!It only served as the carrot on a stick driving the donkey. This shows the true essence of Marxism-Leninism aka Socialism aka Communism aka Maoism aka Collectivism. In societies created to realize this ideologi, freedom was most effectively tamed and destroyed. Again, the masses were perseived as a bunch of cattle and machines to be led by an avantgarde via the Dictatorship of the Proletariat. Meaning: the same old types of bastards in new uniforms creaping into power, so they could have their Champagne and Caviar, while the masses- note how human being now are mentioned as non-individual elements of a swarm - were sweating day-and-week long for a minimum wage in a society of fear, terror, censorship, prison camps, lies and misery. 

 

A socialist society was totally unsustainable and deeply dependant on subsidiaries from the West. This is a fact, that is not known to people and not taught in schools. Billions of $ were transfered to Sovjet Russia from the West to ensure, that Russia and the whole Eastern Block would survive but never compete - until of course the walls of the Cold War went down. Luckily the EU and NATO was there to take over, where the Sovjet dropped out ...

Did we forget to mention, that the Russian Revolution was invented and financed by financial/industrial oligarchs in the City of London and Wall Street in order to crush the strength of traditional Russia and the power of the families, that ruled, the Romanovs, the Csars. The immense envy of the British-American elite towards all perceived rivals (including the German Empire) drove the world into revolutions and world wars. Hundreds of millions of people were slaughtered to satisfy this indescribable envy. The Tychoon families Schiff and Kuhn-Loeb - Jewish, by the way - basically financed the revolution and for their own interest - not for concern of the 'suffering' of the Russians, that did quite well before the revolution. Jewish like Marx, Lenin, Trotsky, the Bolsjevik Commisarians, Ilya Ehrenburg (Stalins Goebbels), all the leading figures in the Culture Marxist re-invention of Marxism, and the leaders of the zionist movement, of course, + a majority of investment bankers and financial manipulators in Goldman Sachs (just to mention one major finance corporation). Just a side note, probably a coinsidence.
Ideology Sucks!

Time for more aphorisms.

Liberal Newspeak 

Free Newspeak, only in latin. 

Neither Liberal nor Conservative mean anything any longer. Meaning nothing means, though, that they can't be opposites, but the same soup. 

Liberals and Conservatives of the World Unite and become Nihilists!

A Liberal is a variation of Cultural Marxist.

A Cultural Marxist is a variation of a Puritan.

A Puritan is someone that believes, that Nature is a filthy thing and should be fought with all means and by all means. Which includes the human nature. 

Liberal education is the destruction of critical thinking and healthy logic by the means of political correctness.

The result of the war on human nature is what we see all around us. It is not a happy site.

Liberal then means something after all. I am contradictin myself, hurrah! It means the exact opposite of liberal aka itself, which qualifies it as newspeak of the first degree.

The second objection

Let us repeat the statement, that could provoke objection:

Freedom is not our birth right. But when noone stops us from living according to our nature, the freedom of Nature will be given to us by Nature itself. Not 'for free', because then we will eventually start acting out certain limits to our behaviour towards others and to Nature. We will regain respect for a world in balance, and abundance will re-emerge.

As I have argued, the rulers of the world simply denies in their own interest that this may hold any truth. Let us look at the objection of the concerned sceptics.

The position of the first objection I have expelled from my system by an act of mental detoxing. Regular readers of paradigmet.blogspot.comwill know this and may even aggree. The position of the second objection is still an ongoing internal dialogue within myself and with others. All dialogue seems to be internal and external at the same time.

The second objection again shows the complexity of the subject. An image, an example: A tortured, traumatized slave or prisoner is released from his confinement. But he refuses to be released. His life as a prisoner formed his behaviour to an extend, that he became dependant on his own imprisonment. You may say, that he fell in love with his trauma.

The wet dream or favorite scenario of the rulers of the world is, that people will learn to love their own enslavement. This is the Fabian Socialism as described by people like H.G. Wells, Bertrand Russell and the brothers Aldous and Julian Huxley. The strategy of the Fabians are to nudge peoples and nations small steps by small steps into a new technocratic version of collectivism, Communism 2.0. These people and their networks, societies and institutions were not marginal but highly essential and influential in social ingeneering our present society.

SO: the claim of the sceptics is, that these people have already won the battle, and that our societies and the mindset of a majority of people of this world is now ripe for the takeover of the Globalists to form theirNew World Order as theysee it. They have the technocratic means to do it - the means that both Orwell and Huxley predicted and/or wished for. Huxley for sure, Orwell for uncertain.

This is the whole battle of optimism and pessimism, that is the ongoing discourse. It is inside my head, for sure, and I find it ever present in the debates among concerned people. The skisma is between analyzing the dying world and visualizing another coming world. A New World Order will come, for sure. But the term has been hi-jacked by the ruling class to mean theirNWO. Some have claimed that this is what the rulers of human history do every time, a major shift of Paradigm is about to occour. It may very well be so.

My objection to the objection is, that it is far too subserviant to the perversion of freedom. By the way, did you notice, that the US draconian Homeland Security Act now is re-branded as Freedom Act? How disgusting will it be?

I understand and respect the objection of inevitability. It even seems plausible. But I reject it as defaitism. If we fall in love with the analyzis, we loose. We accept once more in a same-same-but-different way the narrative of the rulers. This is not to discredit the analyzis, since I would then discredit the overall project of paradigmet.blogspot.comdoing this analyzis for the most part. It is to reclaim hope, respect, honor, honesty, integrity, strength, fidelity, truth, virtue, morality, chivalry, conscience, empathy, pride, all the good and old stuff, that has being assaulted by the Cult of Perversionfor decades and centuriesby us saying:We neither submit to your narrative and your agenda when you are NOT admitting, nor when you - caught with your filthy pants down - ARE admitting, yet arrogantly continuing your rape of humanity with a grin on your face.

I suggest that we reclaim language. Let us reclaim the word Freedomas a word that really means something. Let us thereby dismantle Global Nihilism, that feeds on and perverts meanings as a whole.

Let us re-introduce the concept of True Speak as a respond to New Speak.

Chivalry - Truth and Nothingness

by morton_h, the blogger

We live in times where universal human values and concepts able to describe them are vanishing. Often they seem lost or sochanged in their core, that they are no longer adequate. In some casesvalues and concepts are so exposed to scorn, censorship, condemnation or attacked by political correctness, that they barely survive. Other times they are transformed into newspeak.

Using the concept of truth  today is almost considered a mortal sin. How dare you use that word? You can say say that, you megalomaniac! The truth does not exist! 

[scroll ned for at læse på dansk]  

Contemporary speech is nihilistic. When we all have our private relative version of reality, then all conversation will cease, and so will any coherence ordepth. Something rulesin a hidden layer, and everyone's consciousness has become an atom. Paradoxically, everyone's homemade construction of reality is amazingly similar to everyone else's. Very few have formed a world view based on actual thinking and proper knowledge. So in a way, people are right when they claim that you can not talk about truth. They aretalking about themselves, for they have abandoned any ambition for obtaining truth and have bought a prefabricated pseudo-truth in the nearest supermarket selling that stuff. We live on copy-paste-island.

When the ancients spoke the truth, so they meant a completedmindset. Truth is logically consistent. You can not achieve this consistency, if you have not completed yourgrammar (what-who-where-when), which iswhat is left out in the media presentation of events, the 2D reality of no purpose and no meaning which is: no thruth.

But the ancient, and actually our grand parentshad something more than just logical consistancy in mind. They sought a correlation between the objective and the subjective, the outer and inner reality, where they had found aplace in life and knew the purpose of place and life. I hear backgroundvoices saying: Well, in the good old days it was much easier, because the world was not so complicated. I will say to that: It is both right and wrong, and we maymiss an important point. In the 'good' old days community supported coherence. Today society'spriority is thedecrease of coherence.

When nihilist award hisfatwah against the use of the concept of truth, it is because the word is a challenge to the mindset ofnothingness. When inability to accept universal values in accordance with aninner truth/coherence andtranslate thisinto actions in the exterior, such an undertaking must become aprohibited area, as others may not therefore profess. Truth is deeply disturbing to a nihilistic world view. The nihilistic crusade is a warfare against everything that disturbs meaninglessness.

The Knight's Codex

There is no chivalry in thecrusade of nihilism. There were lots of knights, but less chivalry in the real crusadesthat unfolded in medieval Europe and Middle East in the great Clash of Civilizations, predatingwhat we are witnessing today. Chivalry, the concept of chivalry, is far older than the Crusades. Just like thebogus neo-crusades of our timea hijacking of virtues tookplace in the middele ages. It was shouted outin recruiting campaigns: You are all sinners, but by making your Mounted skills available to the slaughter of infidels in Palestine, you can atone for all your sins at once.

The Crusades were the return of a much older phenomenon originating in pre-antiqueBabylon: the combination of Usura banking and demon cult personified by medieval most influential grouping: Templar Order. This order, this cult never worshipped The Christ but a demon called Baphometh. They had so many fighting men / knights, bankers, ships and accumulated hardcore values that they represented a supranational and unparalleled power factor. The ordercame after the Crusades under pressure and resurrected/morhedas the Jesuit Order, who again morphed on withan array of tentacles in a global control system: the Illuminated, the Revolutionaries, Masonic Lodges, the Zionists. We find them today in central banking interwoven with the descendants of the Venetians now called the Atlantic Globalists. They became, as Paul Gottfried call them:'the priesthood of the management class'.

The concept of chivalry was hi-jacket bycrusade philosophy. Honorary concepts were politizised. Virtues wereideologized and pathologized. Today we know just a blunted or romanticized version of it. 

Futuwa

Canwe still find the concepts of chivalry and if so, where? I have found it in the Crusader'sinfidel enemy: Islam. Or rather in the spiritual movement older than Islam, that invented a survival form insideIslamic culture domination: Sufism. The Sufi concept Futuwwaor heroic generosityis both a spiritual concept and the moralityof a knight. Chivalry is TheWay of the Sufi. For the dervish it means generosity extended to self-sacrifice; to give yourlife for a friend's sake.

The philosophy comes from a book called The Book of Sufi Chivalry - Kitab al-Futuwwa, an important text of al-Sulamifrom the 10th century. It is a guide to the heroism of generosity, compassion, love, friendship, hospitality and right action based on these virtues asa means of spiritual development.

The knight is hard on himself and kind to others. The knight complieswith a strict moral codexwithout insisting that others should adopt this disciplined lifestyle. If you want to assume this lifestyle, then you should do it, but do forGod's sake - and for othersand your own sake - not boast of it and make others feel small by not assume the same strict self-discipline and set of opinions. Instead, let the people be inspired when they see the consequences and gains thereby. Thus one of the great Islamic theologians and Sufi philosophers al-Ghazali(Abū Hamid Muhammad ibn Muhammad al-Ghazali, 1058-1111).

Spiritual chivalry is incompatible with the rule of tyranny. Chivalry shakes supremacy to its foundations. Chivalry and tyranny are diametrically opposed. Tyranny is a negation of chivalry. What is good becomes evil in tyrannical negation / government. What's good for the tyrant is evil for the people.Goodand evilare also universal value-concepts that we should be careful though not afraid to use, because through their inclusiveness and universality they can be corrupted and by the redefinition of tyranny come to mean just the opposite. If tyranny aspersonified evil, The Evil, the Devil, Satan - we understand that the old created an image to be able ot talk about it –would hide most effectively, it would just be in the form of The Good. Hence the the saying: 'the road to Hell is paved with good intentions'. It is seductive. Without a well-developed moral compass and an equally mature discernment, there is immediate confusion.

We live in times of maximum confusion, where many people have no moral compass and thus willing to be persuaded to think and do things, that they in a balanced, healthy human environment would neverhave thought of. We live in times without honor. People put no pride in thinking and acting in certain ways. They have taught themselves - with help from a hidden hand - to live in a state of dissonance and contradiction. The concept of duty has largely disappeared. Instead, we are talking about right, desire and freedom of choice - even when freedom of choice does not exist. The concept of responsibilityhas becometyranny language synonymous with stooping subservience and blind obedience to authority. Responsibility is then to do what you are being toldand then re-spond, when asked: Have you paid taxes in duetime, you have done your school work for tomorrow? Young computer gamers play Call of Duty, where they as virtual Black-Ops-US-Military-Clones areshooting down all who disobey the Empire. TV, media, Hollywood and the game industry have all submitted bids for the killing of moral and ethical duty.

When truth is the missing component of the good, the bad, the honor, the duty and theresponsibility is missing the most important, without which all other concepts disintegrate. We become ships and boats without compass.
 
Define truth

Is not it difficult? Not at all. But it willbe difficult, if truth doesnot already live in ourworld of experience. I can not feel it, ergo it does not exist. Or:It has not been on TV recently, ergo it does not exist.

Truth is brain with heart control. It isclarity of thought protected by alife-supporting element. The balance of masculineand feminequalities of life, where one set implies the other. Note: we are not talking about men'sand women's qualities.

Therefore, it is not really difficult to assess whether there is truth in the outer phenomena or in human relations. It will be difficult if you leave to others to evaluate and disseminate their assessment, which you then without discernment copy-paste and spitout of your own mouth. It is in general difficult, if a meeting does not take place. In front of the television display, there never was a meeting. Not-Meeting apparently issystematized. TV audence never meetsthe politicians, the politicians never meetthe TV audence(the citizen / the voter), journalists never meet terrorists, terrorist or politician nevermeet victims of terror. Some politicians meet regularly with terrorists, but that's another story (eg: Senator McCain without scruples meets with the worst scumbags in the world and promise them lots of money and weapons). Pharmaceutical manufacturersnever meetmedicine wrecks, stock brokers never meet the the brokenor the homeless, drone pilot meetings never descendants of the dead in the village, architectsnever meet the residents of neo-slums, food-and chemistry manufacturersnever meet those who becamesick and exhibits plenitudesof symptoms of chemical poisoning. 

Removing the Meeting will remove the responsibility- and causality chain. Consider the other hand an event. Ask if it is life-enhancing. Rate the longer-term effects. Do not initially ask those who should be responsible. Just ask for what you see and what other with eyes in theirheads seen. Then return to those who should have been responsible. Do not expect answers, and never accept answers that make no sense. Keep on asking, even if answersdo not match.

You maysee, on the contrary, people who thrive and people who have a real impact on their lives. Then there will be truth. You are seeing genuine sustainability(a currently loaded words also perverted with newspeak-ability), and congratulations! Knowing that the opposite of truth is a lie, which is never sustainable and self-propelled, but must be maintained every day 24/7/365.

What an enormous waste of resources are not included in the maintenance of a lie? I hardly dare think of it.

But actually, if you have learned to ask: Does this support Human Life and Natural Life?You will eventually find truth. It's that simple! But mind you, simplicity is also under attack these days ...
 
The Nothingness
In Michael Ende's The Never Ending Story –the author is actually a philosopher who writes children's books - the concept of Nothingnessof is the negating principle that destroys The World. The principle is the principle known in physics as Entropy(thermo dynamics), theexploding thenself destroyingUniverse, BigBang-physics, Darwinism and its ideological companion: Eugenics, the oil industrialparadigm, usura banking and eternal indebtedness In Ende's story it is a sort of mythologicalentropic force that destroys imagination, creativity and fantasy.

The Never Ending Story has a Jungian, psychoanalyticalangle to it. The authors case study is the protagonist of the story, the boy Balthazar Bux, caught in an identity crisis caused by a parent-child complex. He seeks refuge in his imagination, which lasts for a while due to its fabulous richness. But hisamazing counter-reality at some point hasto re-unite andbe accountable to the 'real' reality. The story is a psychological-spiritual road movie.

Ende's genius is that entropy, the destruction of the world called Nothingness, has a higher purpose. Both the reality and escape into fantasy was prodigal - or necessary. Un-reality necessitated the flight to the imagination, which enabled theNothingness, which provoked thereturn to reality and the brokenWorld. Thus the full circle. It is a Jungian-mythical healing model. Balthazarsquest is theKnight's quest, the quest of truth, thesynchronization project of inner and outer reality. The quest starts in dissonanceand ends in consonance. The Knights quest is not supposed to be a tragedy, but a comedy. Or rather: the Knights quest is an open quest. What's it going to be: a tragedy or a comedy? Only if the Knight choses his need before his wants, he will fulfill his quest.

No one has described the Knights quest better than Joseph Campbell in his classic: 'The Hero with a Thousand Faces'. The Knight is the Hero, the Hero is the Knight. The story is immortal because it is archetypal. We all must go that way if wedo not betray ourfate. Fate is a variety of creation, you will need to recognize why you created. You may not know that, if you are not familiar with old Norse language. Skæbneand Skabning mean Destityand Creature/Creation. You are created with a destiny, with purpose. Fulfill it and thrive, deny it and suffer.

Ridley Scott puts the concept of the Knight at play in his monumental movie Kingdom of Heaven. As Balthazar Bux in an adult version he puts his come-to-be-Knight-protagonistinto a state of mess torn up with roots from hisown land. The peculiarity and beauty of the film is its illumination of the Knight in the era of the Crusades. The opponents, he meets, turn out to be of the highest integrity. Islam maintains the concepts of honor and chivalry, while Christianity has long perverted them. Or rather: Christianity'sinner enemies committed treason against theideals of Christianity and in the First Crusade Christianitybecame morallyand factually the loser of the battle. The Knight, the young blacksmith from the SouthernFrance, in the story does not deviate from hispath and thecodices of Knighthood, even when the dream of Jerusalem becomes Nothingness. 

Subsequently and returned to his home town he chooses never to return. When the call comes - the start of the second crusade - he stands by his life as a blacksmith. He atoned himself and won his queen, thus he fulfilled his quest. If you have not seen the movie, this willnot be aspoiler.

When Ridley Scott is best, he is in powers ofincorporating the archetypal heroic narrative of human history. He succeeded in his early masterpiece Blade Runner. Hesucceeded in strange way in Alien 1. They almost succeeded in Gladiator. And hesucceeds completely in the 'Kingdom of Heaven', which unfortunately has become a somehowoverlooked film.

Ridderlighed - sandhed og intethed

At bruge begrebet Sandhed regnes i dag for en dødssynd. Hvor vover man at bruge det ord? Det kan du ikke bruge, du lider af storhedsvanvid! Sandheden findes jo ikke!

Vor tids tale er nihilistisk. Når alle kun har deres egen relative version af virkeligheden, ophører al samtale, sammenhæng, dybde. Noget hersker i et skjult lag, og alles bevidsthed er blevet til atomer. Paradoksalt nok er alles hjemmelavede konstruktion forbløffende ens, for meget få har dannet et verdensbillede baseret på egentlig tænkning og egentlig viden. Så på en måde har folk ret, når de påstår, at man ikke kan tale om sandhed, men de taler om dem selv, for de har opgivet enhver sandhed med både stort og lille S og købt en præfabrikeret pseudo-sandhed i nærmeste bevidstheds-supermarked.

Når de gamle talte om Sandhed, mente de et fuldført tankesæt. Sandhed er logisk konsistent. Man kan ikke opnå denne konsistens, hvis man ikke har fuldført sin grammatik (hvad-hvem-hvor-hvornår), altså alt det, der er udeladt i mediernes præsentation af begivenheder, 2D-virkeligheden uden mål og mening.

Men de gamle mente også noget mere end logisk overensstemmelse. De efterstræbte en overensstemmelse mellem det objektive og det subjektive, den ydre og den indre virkelighed, hvor man havde fundet sin placering i livet og kendte det formål, der aldrig kan gives af andre. Jeg hører straks stemmer i baggrunden, der siger: Jamen, i de gode gamle dage var det også meget nemmere, for verden var ikke så kompliceret. Jeg vil sige: Det er både rigtigt og forkert, og vi misser en vigtig pointe. I de 'gode' gamle dage understøttede samfundet overensstemmelse. I dag forsøger samfundet at ødelægge overensstemmelse.

Når nihilisten udsteder sin fatwah mod brug af begrebet sandhed, er det, fordi ordet anfægter vedkommende i sin værdiløshed. Når man ikke evner at fatte universelle værdier i overensstemmelse med en indre sandhed omsat til handlinger i det ydre, bliver et sådant forehavende til forbudt område, som andre derfor ikke må bekende sig til. Sandhed er dybt forstyrrende for et nihilistisk verdensbillede. Det nihilistiske korstog er en krigsførelse mod alt, der forstyrrer meningsløsheden.

Ridderens kodeks

Der er ingen ridderlighed i nihilistens korstog. Der var masser af riddere, men mindre ridderlighed i de egentlige korstog, der udspandt sig i middelalderens Europa og Mellemøsten i det store Clash of Civilisations, der prædaterede, hvad vi er vidne til i dag. Chivalry, konceptet om ridderlighed, er langt ældre end korstogene. Nøjagtig som i vor tids forløjede neo-korstog, fandt der dengang en kapring af dyder (hijacking of virtues) sted. Det hed sig i hvervekampagnerne: I er alle syndere, men ved at stille jeres beredne færdigheder til rådighed for nedslagtningen af vantro i Palæstina, kan I sone alle jeres synder i ét hug - eller rettere: for hvert hug, der skiller en vantros hoved fra dennes krop.

Korstogene var genkomsten af et langt ældre fænomen med oprindelse i præantikkens Babylon: kombinationen af Usura-bankvæsen og dæmonkult personificeret af middelalderens mest indflydelsesrige gruppering: Tempelridderordenen. De havde så mange våbenføre mænd/riddere, bankfolk, skibe og ophobede hardcore-værdier, at de udgjorde en overstatslig magtfaktor uden sidestykke. De morfede efter korstogene under pres og genopstod som jesuitterordenen, der morfede videre som en vifte af fangarme i et globalt kontrolsystem: de illuminerede, de revolutionære, frimurerlogerne, zionisterne. Vi finder dem i dag i centralbankvæsenet sammenvævet med efterkommerne af venetianerne, hos de 'atlantiske globalister' og hos dem, som Paul Gottfried kalder for 'præsteskabet i management-klassen'.

Begrebet ridderlighed blev hi-jacket af korstogs-filosofien. Æresbegreber blev politiseret. Dyder blev ideologiseret og patologiseret. I dag kender vi kun en afstumpet eller romantiseret udgave af det.

Futuwwa

Findes der stadig begreber for ridderlighed og i så fald: hvor? Jeg har fundet det hos korstogenes vantro fjendebillede: Islam. Eller rettere i den spirituelle bevægelse, der er ældre end Islam, men som måtte opfinde en overlevelsesform indenfor islamisk kulturdominans: Sufismen. Det sufistiske begreb Futuwwa eller 'heroisk generøsitet'er både et spirituelt begreb og et moralsæt for en ridder. Ridderlighed er sufiens vej. For dervishen betyder det generøsitet udvidet til selv-opofrelse; at give sit liv for en vens skyld.

Filosofien stammer fra en bog kaldet The Book of Sufi Chivalry - Kitab al-Futuwwa, der er en vigtigt tekst af al-Sulami fra det 10. århundrede. Det er en guide til heroisme hvor generøsitet, medfølelse, kærlighed, venskab, gæstfrihed og ret handling udfra disse dyder, er et middel til spirituel udvikling.

Ridderen er hård ved sig selv og venlig overfor andre. Ridderen overholder et strengt moralsk kodeks, uden at insistere på, at andre skal adoptere denne disciplinerede livsstil. Hvis du ønsker at påtage dig denne livsstil, skal du gøre det, men lad for Guds skyld - og for menneskers og egen skyld - være med at prale af det og få andre til at føle sig små ved ikke at påtage sig samme strenge selvdisciplin og meningssæt. Lad i stedet folk blive inspireret, hvis de ser konsekvenser og gevinster derved. Således en af de helt store islamiske teologer og sufi-filosoffer al-Ghazali (Abū Ḥāmid Muḥammad ibn Muḥammad al-Ghazālī, 1058–1111).

Spirituel ridderlighed er uforenlig med tyranni. Ridderlighed ryster overherredømme i sin grundvold. Ridderlighed og tyranni er diametralt modsatte. Tyranni er en negering af ridderlighed. Hvad der er godt bliver til ondt i tyrannisk negering/regering. Hvad der er godt for tyrannen, er ondskab for folket.

Godt og ondt er ligeledes universelle værdi-begreber, som vi bør være forsigtige med, for de kan via deres rummelighed og universalitet korrumperes og omdefineres af tyranniet til at mene just det modsatte. Hvis tyranniet, den personificerede ondskab, den Onde, Djævelen, Satan - vi forstår, at de gamle skabte et billede for at kunne tale om det - skal gemme sig mest effektivt, skal det netop være i form af det Gode. Deraf 'Vejen til helvede er brolagt med gode viljer'. Den er forførerisk. Uden et veludviklet moralsk kompas og en ligeså veludviklet skelneevne, opstår der omgående forvirring.

Vi lever i tider med maksimal forvirring, hvor de mange mennesker er uden moralsk kompas og dermed villige til at lade sig overtale til at mene og gøre ting, som de i et balanceret, sundt menneskeligt miljø ville have forsvoret. Vi lever i tider uden ære. Mennesker sætter ikke en ære i at tænke og handle på bestemte måder. De har lært sig selv - med hjælp fra anden hånd - at leve i en tilstand af dissonans og uoverensstemmelse. Begrebet pligt er stort set forsvundet. I stedet taler vi om ret, lyst og valgfrihed - selv når friheden til valg ikke findes. Begrebet ansvar er i tyranniets sprogbrug synonymt med duknakket følgagtighed og blind autoritetstro. Ansvar er herefter at gøre, hvad der bliver sagt og så 'svare an', når du bliver spurgt: Har du betalt skat til tiden, har du lavet regnestykker til i morgen? Unge computer-gamere spiller 'Call of Duty' (Pligtens Kald), hvor de som virtuelle Black-Ops-US-Military-Clones render rundt og nakker alle, der er ulydige mod Imperiet. Fjernsyn, medier, Hollywood og spil-industri har alle budt ind med aflivning af moral og etisk pligt.

Når sandhed mangler som komponent i det gode, det onde, æren, pligten og ansvaret, mangler det vigtigste, uden hvilket andre begreber går i opløsning.

Definér sandhed

Er det ikke svært? Overhovedet ikke. Men det kan være svært, hvis det ikke allerede bor i ens erfaringsverden. Jeg kan ikke mærke det, ergo findes det ikke. Eller: Det har ikke været i fjernsynet for nylig, ergo findes det ikke.

Sandhed er hjerne med hjertestyring. Det er klarhed i tanken beskyttet af det livsfremmende element. Det er balance i maskuline og feminine livskvaliteter, hvor det ene sæt forudsætter det andet.

Derfor er det egentlig ikke svært at vurdere, om der findes sandhed i ydre fænomener. Det bliver svært, hvis du overlader til andre at vurdere og videreformidle deres vurdering, som du så copy-paster og lukker ud af din egne mund. Det bliver i det hele taget svært, hvis der ikke finder et møde sted. Foran fjernsynsskærmen finder der aldrig et møde sted. Ikke-mødet er sat i system. Fjernsynskiggeren møder aldrig politikeren, politikeren møder aldrig fjernsynskiggeren (synonym for borger/vælger), hverken journalisten, terroristen eller politikeren møder ofrene for terror. Visse politikere mødes jævnligt med terrorister, men det er en anden historie (fx: senator McCain mødes uden at blinke med de værste scumbags i verden og lover dem masser af penge og våben). Medicinalfabrikanten møder aldrig medicinvraget, børsmægleren møder aldrig den konkursramte eller den hjemløse, dronepiloten møder aldrig efterkommerne af de døde i landsbyen, arkitekten møder aldrig beboerne i neo-slummen, landmanden og kemifabrikanten møder aldrig dem, der blev syge og udviser plejader af symptomer på kemisk forgiftning.

Når man fjerner mødet, skærer man årsags- og ansvarskæden over. Betragt derimod en hændelse. Spørg, om den er livsfremmende. Vurder effekten på længere sigt. Lad være med i første omgang at spørge dem, der burde være ansvarlige. Bare spørg til det, du ser, og det, andre med øjne i hovedet har set. Vend derefter tilbage til de, der burde have været ansvarlige. Forvent ikke svar, og godtag aldrig svar, der ikke giver mening. Bliv ved med at spørge, selvom de ikke svarer.

Ser du derimod mennesker, der trives, og mennesker, der har reel indflydelse på deres liv, findes der sandhed. Du er vidne til ægte bæredygtighed (et for tiden belastet ord), og tillykke med det! Vel vidende, at det modsatte af sandhed er løgn, som aldrig er bæredygtig og selvkørende, men skal opretholdes hver dag 24/7/365.

Hvilket umådeligt ressourcespild indgår der ikke i opretholdelsen af løgn? Jeg tør næsten ikke tænke på det.

Intetheden

I Michael Ende's Den Uendelige Historie bruger filosoffen, der skriver børnebøger, begrebet 'intetheden' for det negerende princip, der destruerer verden. Princippet er entropien (termodynamikken), det eksploderende, selvdestruktive Univers, BigBang-fysikken, darwinismen og dens ideologiske følgesvend: eugenikken, olieindustriens paradigme, Usura-bankvæsenet og den evige forgældelse. I Ende's historie er det en slags mytologiseret entropisk kraft, der ødelægger 'Fantasien'.

Ende har en jungiansk, psykoanalystisk vinkel på begrebet. Hans case-study er hovedpersonen i fortællingen, drengen Balthazar Bux, fanget i en identitetskrise, der har med forældre-barn-komplekset at gøre. Han søger tilflugt i sin fantasi, der varer for en stund grundet sin fantastiske rigdom. Men den fantastiske mod-virkelighed er på et tidspunkt nødt til at vende tilbage og stå til ansvar i den forløjede såkaldt 'virkelige' virkelighed.

Ende's genistreg er, at entropien, ødelæggelsen af verden kaldet 'intetheden', har et højere formål. Både virkeligheden og flugten ind i fantasien var forlorne - eller nødvendige. (U)virkeligheden nødvendiggjorde flugten til Fantasien, som aktiverede Intetheden, som fremprovokerede en tilbagevenden til virkeligheden og verden. Ringen sluttes på denne måde. Det er en jungiansk-mytisk healing-model. Balthazars quest er en ridders færd. Ridderens færd er en søgen af sandhed - et synkroniserings-projekt af indre og ydre virkelighed. Færden starter i dissonans og ender i konsonans.

Ingen har beskrevet ridderens færd bedre end Joseph Campbell i sin klassiker: 'Hero with a Thousand Faces'. Ridderen er helten, helten er ridderen. Historien er udødelig, fordi den er arketypisk. Alle må gå den vej, hvis de ikke vil forråde deres skæbne. Skæbne er en afart af 'skabning', du bliver nødt til at erkende, hvorfor du er skabt.

Ridley Scott sætter ridderbegrebet på spil i sin monumentale film Kingdom of Heaven. Som Balthazar Bux i en voksen udgave, sætter ridderen ud i en tilstand af rod, der er revet op af egen jord. Det særlige og fine ved filmen er dens belysning af ridderen i korstogets æra. De opponenter, han møder, viser sig at være af højeste integritet. Islam opretholder æresbegreberne og ridderligheden, mens kristendommen for længst har perverteret dem. Eller rettere: kristendommens indre fjender begik forrædderi mod egne idealer og blev i det første korstog både den moralske og faktuelle taber. Ridderen, den unge smed fra Sydfrankrig, afstår i fortællingen ikke fra sin vej og sit kodeks, men holder ud, også da drømmen om Jerusalem bliver til Intethed. Efterfølgende og hjemvendt, vælger han aldrig mere at vende tilbage. Da kaldet kommer - starten på det 2. korstog - står han ved sit liv som smed. Han har sonet sig selv og vundet sin dronning. Hvis du ikke har set filmen, er dette ikke en spoiler.

Når Ridley Scott er bedst, magter han at indbygge den arketypiske, heroiske fortælling i den menneskelige historie. Det lykkedes for ham i sit tidlige mesterværk Blade Runner. Det lykkedes på en sær måde i Alien 1. Det lykkedes næsten for ham i Gladiator. Og det lykkes fuldstændig i 'Kingdom of Heaven', der desværre er blevet en lidt overset film.