Neuro-Hacking the Mass Mind (II)

Conférence Neuro-Pirates, Neuro-Esclaves partie 1 : Intervention de Lucien Cerise (Neuro-Hackers Conference – Neuro-Slaves Part I: A Talk by Lucien Cerise)

---

 
By M.K. Stylinski AKA Infrakshun
Continuing our exploration ( See part 1 here ) of Lucien Cerise’s collection of essays entitled Neuro-Hackers: Reflections on Social Engineering (2016) (Neuro-Pirates Reflexions Sur L’Ingenierie Sociale) published by Kontre Kulture.
Neuro-Hackers provides an overview of a neurological “hacking” that has been taking place in the modern age and imposed upon global populations. It seeks a “maximum efficacy” in the elimination of the seeds of revolt and if such a revolutions manifest they are to be of the Establishment’s choosing – not ours. More alarmingly, since we are no more than cattle or sheep for these self-elected Masters, it is of the utmost importance to their objectives that the collective herd does not awaken to its own power. It seems at the end of every route to true freedom they have prepared for it, anticipated it and created avenues by which we will be “entertained.”
As Cerise states:

In our age of increasing labour automation the master no longer depends on his slave for production and can therefore begin to physically suppress him. But in order not to provoke a reaction, he must do so stealthily, without striking it him thus, by stages plunging him into a globally anxiogenic, pathogenic, depressing and morbid environment where everything is polluted and toxic to the body and mind, from ambient chemical molecules to the ideas and representations disseminated in public opinion. Thus it is that a whole population is murdered by a small fire without being aware of it, as in the manner of the “boiled frog.” * ^[1]

In other words, the real battle is not external but through our very minds and the plasticity of our brain and epigenetic inheritance. Hence, the Elite seek to extinguish the very spark of a mental condition that might give rise to a genuine individual and collective awakening. The author mentions the role of the neuro-hackers is to induce a collective suicide and the suppression of creativity through such mental illness so that tribalism is invoked and maintained as camouflage for globalist authorities. Further, he has reminded us of a strata of three social engineering applications currently at play in Western societies in particular, each of which emboldens the other. As an illustration to this idea, we might liken this to the stages required for the erection of a prison for the mind: the ground work or foundation is laid, the building blocks or façade erected and finally the roof under which societies are housed is fixed in place, a container for the mind to which we are all subject.


The three applications employed by the neuro-hackers are as follows:
Dissolution through consumption/consumerism and extreme materialism, where the health of the mind and body is slowly poisoned.

In the first place, one can try to prevent the birth of the feeling of revolt by means of what Zbigniew Brzezinski called tittytainment, namely, dissolution through consumption. It was the role of consumer society to produce a satisfied and uncritical type of human. Consumerism and gentrification turn Man into a domestic animal, weak, obese, docile, atrophied, degenerate. When suffering manifests itself, it is then “naturalized”: it is said to come on its own, no political decision has its origin; the only one responsible is the individual and his personal make-up (psychological and /or physical). This method has its limits because growth and consumption for all have their limitations. Now, the more or less voluntary decay and the critique of consumption engender a psychological rearrangement which represents a real danger to Power. The cattle become nervous, jittery and difficult to manage. How to keep his nascent anger on track? ^[2]

The neutralisation of anger through controlled opposition or a socio-cultural COINTELPRO (Counter-Intelligence Operation) accompanied by the subversion of the left – political correctness being the most obvious tool for control.

If despite the consumerist dissolution, germs of revolt appear, it is still possible for such Power to guide them into a stalemate. It was the role of “the society of the spectacle” – the realm of trickery – to produce a controlled opposition to contain the disappointments of consumption in a false alternative channelled by the media. Against consumption, the dramatic critique of consumption. In other words, the pseudo-subversion of the New Left, a counter pop-culture – anti-authority, feminist, lazy, formless and safe – was launched in the United States in the sixties by the COINTELPRO … in order to seduce young people and divert it away from the serious, trained and disciplined Marxist left; those possessing a good ability to work and aligned with entryism and networking.
The spontaneity myth, according to which the best criticism of the System would be to leave it on a whim, was popularized in those years. When the master is a technocrat in an office – because that is what power is today – the response must also be technocratic and bureaucratic. The structural revolt will be to infiltrate the system in the long term, to study, to invest in the great schools and to create networks of influence and internal co-optation in the major public and private bodies, ministries, NGOs, multinationals, etc; to become a paper-pusher in suit and tie and do what the communist networks did in the fifties in the United States. Certainly, when one is twenty years old and experience legitimate instincts of insurrection, one dreams of expressing such anger at the best of the barricades, at the worst of rock concerts; sometimes on a desert island or in a cabin in the depths of the woods. These are only false leads and ways of derivation, designed so that any revolutionary veil is quickly dispersed just as it is at the end of a demo. No spontaneous insurrection has ever succeeded because the barricades are always framed at the highest level. The potential for political subversion of mass artistic events is nil and has only the function of a narcotic for social control. As for the voluntary withdrawal of affairs from the world, it amounts to letting the enemy advance. Isolation, isolates – period.
When anger manages to emerge, in spite of consumerist apathy and the tight traps set by the Spectacle to reduce it to impotence, there is still a third barrier to overcome: the guilt-tripping of anger. Since the advent of behavioural sciences in the twentieth century, the master observes his slave as a laboratory rat and invents innumerable parades to divert the danger he might one day represent. As we have seen, the first two consist in putting the slave to sleep before his television and, if he wakes up, to repeat the message to him on the television, at the cinema, on the radio, in magazine editorials – that the real, one Revolt is outside the System. ^[3]

The inculcation of guilt.

Number three may be seen as the fail-safe – the bars on the windows of the collective prison; the reinforcement of guilt and acquiescence to the Master. It is both a trap for normal people to serve the dictates of State obligations as well as a call to arms for personalities who harbour authoritarian tendencies. Neuro-hacking the brain of those predisposed to be authoritarian followers – whatever political ideology the individual happens to hold dear – is the way by which the virus spreads and draws out extremism. This time, such pathology is largely expressed through the Orwellian inversion of language and what used to be known as a left-leaning, progressive outlook:

In case these two methods fail, the master still has one last trump up his sleeve: to morally delegitimise the revolt is to guilt the slaves to revolt. This stratagem consists in reversing the place of the executioner and the victim, of the dominant and the dominated, and discouraging the slave from rattling his chains by persuading him that it is he who commits an injustice against the master. In fact, when your master manages to inculcate you with tears in his voice, that he is the victim and you the perpetrator, and threatens to drag you to court if you dare to say otherwise, the mental conditions of the Revolt retract and shrink away. When the master succeeds in making you swallow the idea that it is you, the “bastard” – anti-Semite, racist, homophobe, reactionary, sexist, speciste, etc. – and if you complain of his abuses of power, a leaden silence and self-censorship falls on your mind and inhibits your capacity for action and reaction. And then you only have to turn your anger and aggressiveness upon yourself which has you self-destruct like Laborit’s mice.* Such is the function of political correctness, this tool of social engineering which appeared in the eighties on the American campuses to intimidate any criticism of active minorities who hold the power in the Occident. ^[4]

We can see this engineering of progressivism to the point that much of its activism against the Trump administration (whether you are for or against) is actually fascistic in action and mind-set. The fusion of minority rights has been inverted into a political tool of oppression of the majority – a veritable dictatorship of positive discrimination used as a powerful leverage by the Deep State. The reason why this ideological inversion appears to be mobilised so quickly is due to its incubation since the 1960’s parallel to the use of CoIntelpro alongside the invention of cultural studies, the subjective evaluations of the latter often acting as a buffer to a much needed historical evaluation rooted in epistemological objectivity – at least, the necessity to strive toward that ideal. What we have now is a “cultural war” born from a “contamination of the intellectual world” and a “new intellectual terrorism [which] allows a disqualification, prior to debate, of any speech coming from the ‘majority’ – accused of being necessarily authoritarian and dominating – and to positively discourage speech sourced from ‘minorities’ – presented as strongly dominated and now deserving to occupy everywhere as an act of forced, progressive reparation.” ^[5]

In other words, the minority activists are having their energies used against them as well as the wider population at large in a cynical exercise of political expediency. They still focus on tribal rights, often mixed in with a narcissistic or histrionic need for attention whilst wholly ignorant of the invisible hand that guides them. With a lack of knowledge and discernment such baying can only bring to the fore those for whom the action – any action – is more important than objective truth. This has implications for much bigger issues that we must tackle, notably global terrorism, a nation’s sovereignty and the right to self-determination away from the supranational entities such as the European Union and Anglo-American interference in the Middle East. When Deep State pathology begins to infect society in order that it may continue and extend its ratlines of disorder across the globe then measures need to be taken that are neither right nor left but in the national and thereby international interest:

“In an attempt to lock in their psychological and political control over the dominant majority, the dominant minorities are now playing the moral guilt card, especially what they call ‘national self-interest’. It must be said at once: National self-interest is good for health, especially for the less affluent because it makes it possible to stabilise their living environment by keeping it relatively strong and homeostatic. National self-interest and “national closure” – that is, the national firewall – are the most effective antivirus against power-diffused viruses, which constantly seek to open us up to the point where we can be dissolved more easily. Social engineering is the method by which one penetrates a system without intrusion, without violence, but through a breach of trust, to take control of it by stealth; one thus opens the system freely, lulling its mistrust – the moment of phishing – then infiltrating it without resistance and destroying it from inside by amplifying its latent internal contradictions to fragment it – the moment of triangular conflict.
Immigration is one of the main vectors of this methodology.  Immigration has always killed both in the countries of destination and in the countries of departure, by plundering each other after having opened them up under various moral pretexts, thrown like hooks. For the “French System” what was the date of this injunction to initiation, the prelude to an applied dissolution? It is possible this was made to surface precisely on May ‘68, an historical event characterised by a huge operation of collective phishing introducing individualistic fragmentation and the war of all against all that has unfolded before our eyes since the seventies. In the context of the psychological warfare that surrounds us, individualism has a motivating function that breaks the feeling of belonging to a vast and powerful organization. Deconstructing the viral heritage of May ‘68 is therefore, simply to reconstruct the security of the French System and the immune defence of the French. After the famous “Deconstruction” of the intellectuals of sixty-eight, it is up to us to deconstruct the deconstruction, that is to say, to reconstruct everything that has been destroyed for decades.” ^[6]

To be sure, it is heresy for a socialist/liberal to be against mass immigration or for there to be certain limitations to a constant inflow of groups into a nation – which we can liken to an organism – and expect an already overloaded system to cope at all societal domains. This is not racism but pragmatism. The fact that immigration has been purposely encouraged and engineered by certain nations is also important. It is a product of the very same rapacious desire for resource control and monopolisation of capital flows. Similarly, people are no more than digits on a spreadsheet to be used to re-order and/or blackmail a nation who decides not to play ball. The present immigration crisis is a direct result of regime change and the Deep State/ Overworld drivers; the catastrophic consequences of destroying towns, villages and national infrastructure at the behest of an economic system that uses people as bargaining chips and the literal demographics of capital outlay and income. So, we have genuine migrants seeking refuge in European countries, the governments of which, under the auspices of U.S.-NATO directives are responsible for the very rape and pillage from which they flee. To impose limitations and filters on such immigration flows is natural and necessary not racist or bigoted. It is only logical that Islamic extremists in the pay of Western Intel or Jihadi loose cannons will use such immigration to their advantage. to claim otherwise is simply naive. To ignore the history of false flag terrorism and social engineering is chosen ignorance. Yet, this is the “progressivism” that cherry-picks its evils and refuses to see the bigger picture once the horse has bolted. We cannot pretend that social engineering doesn’t exist nor that it has been very effective in tuning in and tuning out minds like the dial on a radio. Nonetheless, a revisioning and rebuilding of our world must take place, a new revitalising spirit which must grow organically outside our present encouraged tribalism.
This means:

“…to leave the euro, the European Union, NATO, push back NAFTA and reorder borders, boundaries and identities at all levels of existence. To do this, it is imperative to stem the influence of elitist pressure groups that are the main disseminators of contemporary viruses: left-liberalism, cosmopolitanism, Alanticism, Zionism – from which flows mass immigration,  this crime against humanity – as well as transhumanism with its LGBT component, knowing that they all finally recognize one worship, that of Mammon.
The geopolitical translation of our reconstruction will mean preventing the cost of the global government of Jacques Attali, the Warburgs and their various corollaries: the elimination of cash, electronic subcutaneous implants, the traceability of human cattle, the dictatorship of banks, etc. We must maintain at all costs an exteriority to the Western unipolar system and its Wahhbite vassals. How? By preserving, without conditions the sovereignty of the power of the Eurasian continent, Russia, China, Iran and India, guaranteeing the freedom of other peoples on the planet and then liberating the enslaved nations, beginning with ours. As long as there is an exteriority to the unipolar globalist project – multi-polarity and life continue. Globalism advances on the pretext of terrorism. Let us never cease to repeat: the only significant terrorism is that of the State, by means of psychological operations, false flag attacks or an intentional “laissez-faire” which directs things from a distance.” ^[7]

It is perhaps more apropos to reiterate an even more important psycho-immunity that is more subtle than a nation’s immune system of social health, though intimately linked. It is the awareness of a long emergence of psychopaths in positions of power who have taken over the country from within. What if in expending enormous amounts of intellectual and political energy in prevention and shoring up our national walls that the enemy was already inside? We must focus on this issue at least parallel to any considerations of organic revolutions whereby seemingly intractable problems may yet fall into place. Without such a widespread education on an age-old esoteric secret that is effectively a different, conscience-less species nested in humanity, ALL such socio-political resistance will be doomed to failure.
In this sense, the project of revision Cerise notes as “immense” may have already underestimated the challenge if factoring in the presence of pathogenic nodes of evil remains an ephemeral foot note. Nonetheless, the only way to return to any semblance of autonomy away from authoritarian control and cartel capitalism is to rebuild everything, including our conceptions that everyone is essentially the same in terms of conscience, for they are not. And it is this that must remain at the forefront of our quest to improve the world alongside our own self-improvement.

The author does underscore an important secondary element that continually keeps the lid on a future hope for socio-economic freedom for all: the State and its agencies of so-called “anti-terrorism.” As a product of a psychopathic world-view, State centralisation and power-broking is now out-of-control and wholly corrupted by Deep State pathology whose only function is to implement, maintain and extend “a prison management of society” kept in place through optimum levels of fear and ignorance.  It is a prison that will come into being by breaking the spirit of populations so that they willingly accept it. This is the objective of neural-hacking of the mass mind: to trick it into servitude, or as Cerise describes, after breaking that spirit within the prison:

… to abolish the difference between those deprived of liberty using a new hybrid status: semi-liberty for all. Since people cannot be kept inside the prison walls indefinitely, the opposite is achieved, the walls of the prison are opened indefinitely, the prisoners are released, they are monitored a little but not too much, then electronic surveillance is extended to the whole population. Both comprise the other, this gives the penal reform of Taubira * combined with the Great East’s law of intelligence. And in order to facilitate the surveillance of social groups, communitarisation is maximized, on the model of prisons all over the world – whose matrix is the American jail – where detainees are grouped together by ethnic and cultural identity, each with its own prefabricated mythology: Muslims – takfiris / salafists, blacks – gangsta rap, whites – neo-Nazis and White Power in the United States, or regionalist independentists here, etc. ^[8]

Until we see that the State and promotion of tribalism as pervasive social engineering is the problem against us ALL – not any one tribe, cultural identity or ideology – the “Project Freedom” to which Lucien Cerise alludes will remain a pipe dream subject to new twists and turns due to our refusal to see the part we play in its genesis.

***

Lucien Cerise touches on a host of subjects related to social engineering to which I have not been able to do justice since this is merely the briefest of introductions. There is great depth to his work on neuro-hacking and most importantly, compliments the ground-breaking work of Andrew M. Lobaczewski’s Political Ponerology. (Cerise’s exploration of transhumanism in this context is also covered in Neuro-Hackers and something to re-visit in the future -See video below).

I highly recommend those of you who understand French as well as native French speakers to pick up a copy from the links below and visit an interesting example of political left and right finding common ground at Égalité & Réconciliation.  I hope this will encourage you to seek out more independent online bookshops such as Kontre Kulture and Pilule Rouge for example, and to also visit websites offering similar food for thought and networking opportunities to raise our collective awareness.  (The reader may also want to visit selected post series of mine as a contextual primer (see links at end of article).

Argumenter contre le transhumanisme – Conférence de Lucien Cerise en Normandie (1/2) (Arguing Against Transhumanism – a Conference with Lucien Cerise)

---

*  = The boiling frog is an anecdote describing a frog slowly being boiled alive. The premise is that if a frog is put suddenly into boiling water, it will jump out, but if the frog is put in tepid water which is then brought to a boil slowly, it will not perceive the danger and will be cooked to death. The story is often used as a metaphor for the inability or unwillingness of people to react to or be aware of threats that arise gradually.  (Wikipedia)
**  = a French surgeon, writer and philosopher. In 1952, Laborit was instrumental in the development of the drug chlorpromazine, published his findings, and convinced three psychiatrists to test it on a patient, resulting in great success. Laborit was recognized for his work, but as a surgeon searching for an anesthetic, he wound up at odds with psychiatrists who made their own discoveries and competing claims. (Wikipedia)

---

Notes
1 p.8; Cerise, Lucien; Neuro-Pirates Reflexions Sur L’Ingenierie Sociale(2016) | kontrekulture.com
2 Ibid. p.9
3 Ibid. p.10
4 Ibid. p.11
5 Ibid. p.12
6 Ibid. p.13
7 Ibid. p.14
8 Ibid. p.15

Neuro-Hacking the Mass Mind (I)

By M.K. Stylinski AKA Infrakshun

“…brain-hacking through social engineering and other processes is already a reality, and hackers are our brains. This ‘neuro-hacking’ can involve acting on the hardware, that is to say on the biological and genetic substrate of the brain, but it can also involve acting on the software, that is to say, on the communication code that we learn from society.”– Lucien Cerise

---

One of the breakthroughs in understanding the level of influence of the Deep State and Overworld dynamics has been through the recent revelations from Wikileaks’ Podesta emails. A veritable Pandora’s Box of connections has led to Pizzagate – now Pedogate – blackmail, corruption, child pornography, sex trafficking, black magick rituals and a plethora of other sordid revelations fanning out from the quest for regime change and the battle for resources in the Middle East. After researchers from all political persuasions and beliefs had been highlighting these horrors for years, these leaked emails, now being sat on by the FBI, are the closest yet to offering proof of the mechanisms which are passed from one Establishment/Deep State generation to the next like a dark baton slippery with blood.

Slowly but surely the why, who and how of our Official Culture and the drivers which ensure that humanity remains under the yoke of  World State cartels is being revealed in a way that hasn’t been seen before. Oil/Gas, weapons, drugs, and sex/organ trafficking lie at the top of multi-tiered resource pyramid. The financial architecture that perpetuates these unimaginably toxic channels is achieved through a long tradition of social engineering by Elite factions, the puppets & players of which follow a revolving door of power, irrespective of a President and his administration. This is the facade, the entrenched and inevitable outgrowth of the State that permits a shadow government to remain forever at the control panel of perpetual war and social disruption. As top-level power brokers between the CIA, the NSA and FBI jostle for supremacy let’s not forget that overall, these agencies are primarily engaged in a war for our minds as their primary reason for being.

However, let’s not imagine that the Wikileaks organisation and their poster-child Edward Snowden are somehow working for the greater good, although many in their staff may think so. I suspect that this period of permitted leaks is very probably nothing more than a psychological operation, a limited hangout of the CIA and thus an attempt to acclimatize populations to the ubiquity of surveillance and intelligence that is literally inside your home, phone, T.V. and anything else connected to the internet and the emerging SMART society.  This is one facet of the same social engineering project that we’ll discuss below.
It’s a risky game managing the flow of “leaks.” Allow too much information to seep into public consciousness and a momentum begins to emerge, not enough information and they can’t pursue their time-table of phased objectives. Which is why the hacking of lap-tops, smart phones and T.V.’s merely mirrors the hacking of our minds and beliefs – a potentially far more dangerous state of affairs then data mining. For example, the core roots of progressivism and the left have now been infected by ponerological streams of political correctness and narcissism, working in concert with CoIntelpro agents in much the same way as the New Age or Human potential movement as a whole. Thus, social movements such as LGBT, Black Lives Matter and Soros-led “social justice” organisations such as Moveon.org tune into a genuine desire for social equity and “rights” but are created or hijacked early on, driven by Deep State directives that desire the chaos of tribalism as a default setting for society. The younger generation of Millennials – who should be the hope of the world – appear incapable of exploring this dichotomy because they have already been programmed to embody and act out these inverted social-cultural beliefs, ethics and activism. The rise in an epidemic of narcissism in this demographic further encourages feel-good sensation, and a technology-driven buffer to the acknowledgement of nuance, complexity and attention to objective reality. The ability to think outside the box against ingrained conditioning becomes severely limited because it is perceived as an attack against the collective ego mask of self-entitlement.
Thus, Millennials and older generations of the well-intentioned (and not so well-intentioned) are already falling into the many traps, the escape from which will be extremely difficult since the these info-tainment led emotional hooks of manipulation offer benign moral imperatives to seduce a collective projection of unresolved shadows out into the world, thus turning ideology and justice on its head. Controlled opposition has therefore been easy to manufacture, backed up as it is by fake news of the corporate media. Those that are paying attention can see this formula everywhere you look: whether it is the BBC or CNN that promote the Establishment’s agenda of anti-Russian rhetoric to University Campuses engaging in an Orwellian re-branding of vocabulary in an tragi-comic and painfully ironic stand against racsim and bigotry.  Such tactics focus away from what really matters and into the realm of skin-deep analysis of feeling and sensation. This bio-chemical template that is burned into the young brains of new generations is the neural pathway upon which social engineering functions and thrives. Indeed, it seems much of the left, new age/green and “socially aware” are now the unconscious cultural foot-soldiers of the Deep State. This is why social engineering has been adopted with such pin-pointed skill and precision over the years and why it needs to be confronted and thoroughly explored.
The awakening to the nature of the MSM as a monolithic exercise in propaganda and thought control is gaining ground, thanks largely to the internet. It is becoming less easy to monopolise information and applied knowledge in this age of independent news feeds, FOI requests, forum research, whistle-blowers and leaked documents, despite the signs of psyops constantly filtering the truth. There is a real chance for moderates from the left and right (and many shades inbetween) to turn down the volume of their beliefs and collaborate against a common foe – that of institutionalised psychopathy. Which is why the war is being fought through the inner shadows and unresolved issues that we all have. These weaknesses can be exploited and used by the Elite through suitably prolonged exposure to new forms of social engineering. It is for this reason that lines between awareness, knowledge and apathy and ignorance are being drawn.
And so to neuro-hacking…

(left) Author Lucien Cerise and Neuro-Hackers: Reflections on Social Engineering (Neuro-Pirates Reflexions Sur L’Ingenierie Sociale) published in 2016 by Kontre Kulture.

One man who has explored the many-headed hydra of mass mind control is French author Lucien Cerise his essays of which have appeared predominantly on Alan Soral’s Égalité & Réconciliation website which offers a fusion of left-right politics and activism. (Remember Dieudonne M’bala M’bala?) These essays have been collated, updated and arranged by Cerise into a book Neuro-Hackers: Reflections on Social Engineering (2016) (Neuro-Pirates Reflexions Sur L’Ingenierie Sociale) published by Kontre Kulture.  He notes that “it is not really a collection, but rather a book written over four years [between 2012 and 2015] and in successive layers”. Obviously much of the book draws from a French perspective and how social engineering operates in the French culture. The author provides rich and detailed insights, both philosophical and dialectical, into the causes and effects of our mass mind paralysis in the face of a predominantly Western-backed “soft” totalitarianism.  Thus whether you are an American or a European, the revealed dynamics apply across all cultures. In this book you will read about the widespread and systemic use of cognitive infiltration or more appropriately, “neuro-hacking” which describes the institutionalised colonisation of our minds by pathological constructs designed to engineer conformity and compliance to social, cultural and geo-political directives.
I have translated key passages from the foreword  so that readers can gain an introductory flavour of his work.  It might be as well to start with the back cover which provides a synopsis of the contents:

“The first question that runs through this collection of texts is: ‘How to hack a brain?’ The second, essential question then immediately follows: “How to protect it?” This is because brain-hacking through social engineering and other processes is already a reality, and hackers are our brains. This ‘neuro-hacking’ can involve acting on the hardware, that is to say, on the biological and genetic substrate of the brain, but it can also involve acting on the software, that is to say, on the communication code that we learn from society. This code of epigenetic origin – this language, or software – comes to us from the socio-cultural bath into which we are plunged since childhood, imprinting on the brain its neuronal architecture. The study of social groups, their mode of construction and the links which structure them has allowed those who want to control crowds to act on its members, to modify their behaviour or even destroy them as individuals and groups – the ones most dependent on others. For individuals disconnected from any group, hierarchy, representation, or stereotype can only survive by developing symptoms of psychosis. By attacking the natural links, Oedipal ties of the masculine / feminine differentiation, but also of the parent / child hierarchy, by abolishing the notion of limits, whose overcoming in psychology is called perversion, it is society as a whole that is attacked. Destructured and made malleable – one can speak of a ‘liquid society’ – it will then be the plaything of a small oligarchy which will have nothing more to fear from the people whose souls it has appropriated.”

The author takes his inspiration from Neuro-Slaves, by Palo Cioni and Marco Della Luna, a work of cognitive science and social psychology which reviews the various methods of reducing a population to slavery by targeting the brain and bypassing its defence mechanisms.  From a macro-social perspective, one of the most importance principles he believes will counter the present directives of social engineering is the maintenance of a healthy, balanced national self-interest since a national health cannot be secured if we are at the behest of globalist visions, their economic warfare and all that comes with it. In fact, any individual, business or grouping that wishes to maintain a healthy psycho immunological system and to keep alive its spiritual and cultural traditions needs to develop true autonomy, sovereignty and self-determination before it can reach out and engage in the ideal of an “international altruism,” and indeed to allow an emergence of true community at home. In effect, without this independence of mind and natural political pragmatism we are prey to a continual hacking of our neurology, a psycho-virus that seeks to subvert, disinform and hijack constructive forms of perception which would otherwise, quite naturally lead to activities that would denote a rise in public awareness and critical thinking.
As one part of an antidote to globalism and the mental conditioning of authoritarian power structures Cerise believes we must create a “firewall” of the mind to protect against the neural hacking of our brains from toxic memes and implanted beliefs.  Without this learned defence, this “consciousness-hacking” will continue to keep us slaves via the usual “back door” of “progressive” revolutions using techniques of stealth, gradualism and innumerable addictions to consumerism. Cerise reminds us that our “authoritarian masters” hope to maintain our servitude by destroying our very instinct for survival. It is in this sense, when you strip away all the propaganda and euphemistic verbiage, that Western power structures have become totalitarian and genocidal in their scope due to the core desire of the Elite mind-set “to put an end to the human species”.  We could also add to this proposition that they wish to eradicate not only those who are blissfully unaware and happy to follow state authority and its diktats  thus acting as virtual energic food for the Deep State machinery, but more importantly, those with a functioning conscience who are resistant to psycho-pathogenic forces impinging on our consciousness.
Lucien Cerise’s association with Alain Soral and his online hub Egalite & Reconciliation appears to represent a natural meeting of minds, although quite different in approach. This is not merely due to the potential to reach a wider audience in France but as a welcome addition to the continuing attempt to limit tribalism and extremism in both the left and right whilst attempting to illuminate the Elite’s role in the disruption of a natural critical thinking and exploration of political taboos. Cerise is part of a rich philosophical compliment to Soral’s mission of freedom of the mind, politics and class. Yet, (and perhaps all the more fascinating for it) the latter is a volatile example of a pendulum swing between his experiences of the extreme left (communism) and what is seen as the extreme right (National Front) thereby giving credence to the idea that his own personal dialectic on these issues has offered an integration of the best of each political movement underpinned by rigorous objective inquiry. Whether there is a more alt. right bias and tendency for infiltration from these extreme elements is always the danger in such a reactionary interplay. Soral is clearly no stranger to explosive outbursts and instability. However, although it can never be a fail-safe, a pioneering source of rich socio-cultural discourse and political philosophy is one way to mitigate further intrusions and establish a platform for something better than we have now.

For understandable reasons, given Cerise’s “Gaullo-communist” background, establishing closer intellectual and philosophical ties to Alain Soral caused some initial caution when faced with such a controversial figure, as he explains:

Why accept an association with such a sulphurous character? Because for me, Soral is part of the furniture, as they say. His work – a kind of missing link between the academic world and that of the mass media – presents an atypical and unclassifiable character that I began to follow in 1985 when, whilst rummaging in a family library, I found a pocket edition of his first book, The Movements in Fashion Explained to Parents (Les Mouvements des modes explique des parents). I was young but I was immediately fascinated by this opus which I have re-read several times from all angles and from its methodological approach which the human and social sciences call semiotics. What is it about? To summarize: when semiotics is applied to social phenomena, it is the deciphering of the profound meaning of the stories they tell and which remain mostly semi-conscious and subliminal. ^[1]

He further explains in the foreword why he chose to extend this association and the intellectual environment that inspired his imagination:

After a first purely bookish contact with Alain Soral in the mid-eighties, I crossed paths with him two or three times during the years beginning 2000, at a time when I enjoyed a worldly picnic of social evenings in Saint-Germain-Des-Pres, amongst which were Houellebecq, Beigbeder and those from the journal Bordel by Stephanie Million. During all this time I followed his various publications and interventions with a greedy and even growing pleasure as he became more and more provocative and intolerable for a media more and more politically correct and distant from real life. His criticism of communal organizations always seemed to me salutary. The “communities” form states within the state, introduce fifth foreign columns into the national body and work consciously or unconsciously to dislocate it. * The most fortunate of these communities, irritated to be highlighted, came to pronounce against Soral and his acolyte Dieudonne with a kind of Talmudic fatwa, typical of puritanical dehumanizing centres of power across all eras, whose political correctness is only an avatar, and that always seek to forbid the “propre de l’Homme”[proper to the man;  part of man – “Because to laugh is proper to the man.”] that is to say, humour. The hatred against laughter reveals the concentrational dimension of the project of a nourished society that the slaves deride a little by mocking their masters. For my part, not having a turn of mind concerning the observance of dogma, I have never succeeded in taking this verdict seriously, not that I have the taste for provocation but simply because the facts and the real, – the only authorities I respect – stand above all religious tribunals.
I admit to being unsettled by Soral and Dieudonne’s approach toward the National Front, but I have since more easily understood the reasons at the time of the 2005 referendum on the European constitution project. I was in the camp of the “nonistes” of the left under the banner of Jose Bove, Olivier Besancenot and Etienne Chourd, which did not prevent me from quickly observing that if our “No” won, it was thanks to the famous “coagulation” with the NF and the sovereignist right in general. This made me think of our commonalities, perhaps more important than those that separated us – and at least one can say that the continuation of events, not only in Greece but everywhere in Europe, gave us good reason. On this basis, it was quite natural for me to go and see what was going on at Egalite & Reconcialition.
[…]
The French right has been heavily pro-American and Atlanticist for decades, so it has its share of responsibility in the current catastrophic situation, but times have changed. Today the coalition and the mutual cross-fertilisation of the l’Action francaise (French Action party) and the Communist Party is the royal and popular way to restructure what the liberal left and the neo-liberal right have since destructured; the reason why the Power and its opponents do everything to prevent the meeting. This political synthesis possesses its founding myths, its currents and its slogans: Cercle, Proudhon, national-Bolshevism, revolutionary nationalism, CNR, Third Way, solidarism, “coagulation”, “Neither Right nor Left: French” or better still, “left of work, right of values”. ^[2]

For Cerise, in order to understand why we continually move away from a more balanced and cooperative political and social contract means that we must pose semiotic questions on the nature of the psychological, subconscious games people play when they follow a particular fashion or movement. He states: “What personal fable are they telling themselves and how do they want to be perceived? To what personal narcissistic myth are they adhering?” It is an approach that “demythologizes and demystifies social movements” and which, in his view, offers the best entry into social engineering. He believes that while sociological semiotics can be descriptive, it can also be prospective in much the same way that marketing and fashion seek to anticipate trends and seize opportunities in order to amplify and exploit, thus allowing control of their development and orientation.  The author likens this activity to the “detection of early signs” in criminology as well as the probabilities in the quantum field:

Here, the field of study is not the real, but the probability of the real in process of materialisation. Such a method could be a kind of “quantum sociology”, sociology of potential, or events which have not yet arrived in action and exist only at a more or less high probability rate. A fascinating field of research, all in chiaroscuro, that takes place at the dawn of the real, at the junction between night and day, at the boundary between what already exists and what may exist. Social engineering most often consists of identifying these emerging tendencies and shaping them, at least, to modify the course which they would have followed spontaneously, or even to create them ex nihilo by combining, according to an unedited synthesis, between them. This is a kind of cultural filling that meets the memetic on numerous points. ^[3]

Political Ponerology: A Science on the Nature of Evil Adjusted for Political Purposes (2007) by Andrew M. Lobaczewski and Laura Knight-Jadczyk

The only way to navigate through that “chiaroscuro” of quantum sociology is to strive for authenticity and objective reasoning while we are being assailed by waves of subjective, fake news and science.  Those familiar with Andrew Lobaczewski’s insights into macro-social psychopathy or ponerology will see that Cerise’s theories of neuro-hacking naturally aligns with the psychologist’s work. They both highlight the same methods of viral contamination that re-wires our brain circuitry into pathogenic pathways, distorting our psycho-social and ultimately spiritual destiny into a strictly pathological perception and application of reality. Whilst national self-interest with certain provisos, is essential in fostering a natural emergence of local, regional and finally international altruism, to prevent the neural-hacking of our brains and to protect our mental immune system an awareness of social engineering methods and their access points offers the necessary inoculation against such psycho-pathogenic viruses.
In these times of tribalism and Hegelian obfuscation, we would do well to ponder on these ever-present social engineers who work best when we are emotionally reactive and asleep to our unconscious desires and beliefs. The deeper our sleep, the more we open our minds to the neuro-hackers without any realisation that such a violation has incrementally taken place. Hence the importance of a individual and collective firewall of awareness:

In terms of social engineering, these elements of code constitute the antivirus, even to the point of defending our system against viruses without borders, but without excessive restriction imposed upon the network. In order not to become neuro-slaves, let us protect ourselves from neuro-hackers, but without cutting ourselves off from the global environment where we are de facto, immersed. The task is difficult and assumes the avoidance of two pitfalls. While the Power seeks to expose us to unfiltered transnational migratory flows, it is vital to reformulate our nationalist firewall but without losing sight of the horizon of international cooperation into which we are forced during this period of Globalization in action. The ancestral adage “charité bien ordonne commence par soi-même” (“Charity Begins at Home”) will serve as a guideline because it makes it possible to articulate the ego and the Other while respecting the hierarchy of priorities. Against the negative social engineering of Power and its work of systematic inversion of all values, it is therefore urgent to put things in the right place and to affirm loud and clear that … National self-interest is the condition for international altruism. ^[4]

The French are waking up. Many others within Europe, from different belief and ideologies are also beginning to see how the mass mind is being hacked and implanted with memetic viruses of belief that represent psychological time-bombs. Socially engineered extremism has always been the tactic of choice for the Establishment which is why it is crucial that we learn how to guard against such pathology on both the right and the left. The danger is that we may fall into a Huxleyian vision of the future, whilst a more overtly Orwellian effect may take hold from a reactionary fear of the other; hijacking a positive and pragmatic transformation into a cul-de-sac of true intolerance and bigotry. Obviously, both forms of totalitarianism interpenetrate and the onus is on all of us not to get caught up in any form of dogma and evangelism on either side. Most importantly, we have to cultivate a keen sense of the history of State-sponsored terrorism and its relationship to current sociopolitical dynamics; to be fully aware that WE the people are its enemy.

This is where our commonality lies: to breathe life back into the realisation that we are all in the same prison of the mind/body at various levels of awareness.  This is how we must work together against those that would divide us. The Neuro-Hackers are at work as I write, finding new ways to set the different tribes of our rich cultures against it each other.  We must become experts in erecting firewalls in our own minds, permitting entry to only authentic and constructive information streams so that we may have a healthier immunity to future “malware.” Perhaps then we can protect Truth within ourselves and the hope of expressing it with others in the outer world.


*  =  To avoid confusion, it is well to mention that “communitarianism” to which Cerise refers in the French and European context concerns the formation and extension  of tribalism e.g. the Jewish community, the black community, LGBT community, Gay community etc. and their unconscious role in their fragmentation of the social fabric under an Official Culture. In other words, any new grouping or minority can be singled out and hystericised, politicised and used as a tool to control the majority by virtue of their “rights.” A communitariansm that emerges naturally and is a decentralised economic social organisation related to ecology and sustainability obviously has quite a different focus and meaning, albeit also prone to subversion by the State and its pathologies.

---

Notes
1 p.16; Cerise, Lucien; Neuro-Pirates Reflexions Sur L’Ingenierie Sociale(2016) | kontrekulture.com
2 Ibid. pp.18-20
3 Ibid. p.17
4 Ibid. p.20

Zbigniew – En skakspillers død

af marco_hanuman, the blogger

 

Endnu en af de store spindoktorer er død. En mand, der spillede skak med menneskeliv og nationer og ofrede alle de bønder og officerer, han fandt det nødvendigt for at myrde kongen. Vi taler selvfølgelig om Zbigniew Brzezinski, den traumatiserede polak med det manisk besatte had til Rusland, russere og alt russisk. Den strategiske geopolitiker. Den politiske filosof. Manden, der skabte al Qaeda. Manden, hvis hjerne aldrig kom ud af den kolde krig, på samme måde, som en vittig hund sagde om Robert Mugabe: Den mands hjerne blev dannet under modstandskrigen mod britisk imperialisme i 60’er og 70’erne og Ian Smith’s kolonistyre, og han tror stadig, han er midt i den. En sammenligning, der skylder at nævne Brzezinskis noget højere IQ end den præsenile Shona-stammekriger.





Verden bliver tilsyneladende dirigeret af gamle sure mænd, hvoraf en del udviser psykopatiske træk, og hvis verdensbillede ikke har flyttet sig, siden de startede deres livskarriere. Pragmatikere, javist, i metoderne til hele tiden at opfinde nye rævekager, men stivnede i forhold til basalt syn på magt, verden, mennesker og moral (læs: mangel på samme), hvori de aldrig har flyttet sig. Og der kom jeg så til at fornærme både den tyske kansler, den engelske premierminister og den forsmåede amerikanske præsidentkandidat på én gang: af gamle sure mænd og en håndfuld gamle sure kvindfolk, der ikke har flyttet sig en millimeter i halve århundreder, andet end den måde, de har løbet efter magt, med tungen ud af halsen. Forskellen er måske alligevel den, at kvindfolkene aldrig nåede længere end til at servicere magten, og ikke definere den, som Brzezinski, og nyligt afdøde David Rockefeller, der så ham, som sin protegé.

Vandt Brzezinski så skakspillet? Man kan sige, at han vandt spillet, da han har fået lov til at definere storpolitik på menneskehedens bekostning gennem en menneskealder. Her må man næsten omdefinere begrebet menneskealder, for disse ældgamle mænd har åbenbart konstitution, og i Rockefellers tilfælde ubegrænsede midler, til at holde sig i live langt ud over, hvad mange synes er godt for menneskeheden. Rockefeller havde konstant et team af state-of-the-art medicinsk eksperthold parkeret foran sin dør og har fået et ukendt antal livsforlængende hjertetransplantationer. 

Man kan så sige, at Brzezinski ikke vandt spillet i sidste ende, ved at myrde kongen i skakspillet, på det nærmeste personificeret ved den russiske præsident Putin, som repræsentant for en nation, der nægter at lade sig løbe over ende af globalisternes unipolære våde drøm. Han må have kogt af raseri over at konstatere, hvordan flere af de skaktræk, som hans farve af brikker foretog, blev modgået af den antiglobalistiske koalition anført af den russiske præsident, der netop som russer godt vidste, hvad skak var. Libyen kørte efter planen, men det gik galt i både Ukraine og Syrien. Blokaden mod både Rusland og Iran virker ikke, men gør dem stærkere og mere opfindsomme. Japan har fået nok af at sidde i det fængsel, der blev bygget til dem efter 2. Verdenskrig. USA’s entydige og nærmest over-tydelige aggressionspolitik overfor resten af verden bevirker, at ofrene for disse endeløse aggressioner nu samles på tværs og i nye uventede konstellationer.




 
I mellemtiden

Han trådte ind på scenen som personlig sikkerhedsrådgiver for Jimmy Carter i slutningen af 1970’erne. Hans baggrund var polsk adel, med en dårlig erfaring med russisk besættelse (can’t really blame him for that). Familien immigrerede til Canada, hvor han skabte en akademisk karriere bl.a. på McGill University, der er kendt for at være en udklækningscentral for The Deep State. Bl.a. blev mange MK-Ultra-studier udført der. Han har set, hvordan teknologi kan anvendes til mind control, og en af hans teser er, at den kommende verden vil blive regeret af teknokrater, og menneskeheden vil blive fuldstændig reduceret til et tekno-management-produkt. Det kan læses i hans første bog, Between Two Ages. Dette fik David Rockefeller til at få øje på ham, manden, der bl.a. lovpriste Kommunistkina som et vellykket human management project. - hvilket selvfølgelig viser, hvor uendelig lidt menneskeliv og menneskelig velfærd betød for disse magtmenneskelignende støbninger. Ja, undskyld, man må indimellem betvivle deres menneskelighed, når de, uden at blinke, kan lovprise et folkemord på 100 millioner og et kontrolapparat til at skabe et slavesamfund på en milliard mennesker! Men for de geopolitiske skakspillere er mennesker blot skakbrikker, bønder eller officerer lige meget. 

Rockefeller så, at her var en mand, der passede perfekt ind i det globalistiske styresystem, hvorefter han ringede til Henry Kissinger og sagde: Her har vi en mand til mit nye organ, der skal overvåge Council of Foreign Relations – The Trilateral Commission. Brzezinski blev dets første formand. Det er helt neo-feudalistisk. Rockefeller sidder, som en anden kejser, der uddeler en fyrstetitel til en loyal og nyttig upcoming undersåt, en ny prins, som han forærer sit eget fyrstedømme med palads, egen hær og en sæk guld, med beskeden: Du kan hjælpe os med at styre dette Imperium.




 
Denne kommission arbejdede bl.a. i området The Pacific Rim, og mange ser TPP, det transpacifiske partnerskab, som dens seneste skabelse. Det var for øvrigt det, som Donald Trump skød i sænk, sammen med det transatlantiske ditto. Brzezinski taler i sin bog om ideologiernes død, religionernes død og nationernes død. Det er vaskeægte globalisme, og han kunne i samme åndedræt have talt om demokratiets død, men det gjorde han klogeligt ikke, for så var han blevet udråbt som det, han egentlig var: hyper-totalitær neo-liberalist. De gamle institutioner bliver afløst af konsumerismen og den internationale markedsorden, den globale rovdyrkapitalisme. Det er virksomhederne og deres behov, der skal styre alt, og i det omfang, der skønnes brug for regeringer, er det kun som iværksættere af deres agenda.

Altså, globalfascisme. Med fare for at fornærme folk, der stadig mener, at fascisme, med udgangspunkt i 30’ernes Italien og Tyskland, var en god idé – hvilket det på visse punkter var i tidens kontekst – men som har haft svært ved at forstå, at det med hjerner som Brzezinski bliver til en rigtig dårlig idé i videre kontekst. For hvem siger, at Staten, som i Brzezinskis vision, er afløst af en uformelig blob af en globalstat, uden for folkelig, pædagogisk rækkevidde, bliver ledet af mænd og koner med gode intentioner? De er morderligt svære at få øje på. 

Brzezinski afskriver ideologier og styresystemer som socialisme og kapitalisme og siger, at verden bevæger sig mod en ny tid, hvor den nødvendigvis må ledes af en eller anden supermagt. Hvilket selvfølgelig for ham, især i 1970’erne, er ensbetydende med USA, da Sovjetunionen som et stivnet affaldsprodukt af et Wall Street-sponsoreret statskup, med tilhørende designerideologi fra 1917, var ude af stand til noget sådant. De blev reelt holdt oppe ved Vestens subsidier, og den sovjettiske hærs styrke var stærkt overdrevet for at opretholde skræk og rædsel i form af Den Kolde Krig. Han fremlægger endog planer for, hvordan Sovjetunionen vil blive bragt til opløsning og opslugt af konsumerismen, som i Vesten. Det gik ikke helt, som han beskrev det, efter Jeltsin-æraen.



Simultanskak på russisk  

Konsumerisme og teknokrati 

Men bortset fra konsumerismen, hvor folk indgår i en evig cyklus af … æden lort, så at sige, er hans kongstanke, at hele verdens befolkning kan styres med teknokratiske managementmetoder og teknikker for sindskontrol. Brzezinski er en reel årsag til, at konspirationsteoretikere har noget af have deres mistanker rettet imod, fx vejrmodificering og mobiltelefontårne, for han beskriver rent faktisk den slags i sin bog. På den måde fremstår hans visioner som profetiske, på samme måde, som en Aldous Huxleys Fagre Nye Verden og en Orwells 1984, der ikke, som de fleste tror, er advarselsscenarier, men blueprints. Eller en H.G. Wells eller en Bertrand Russell, for hans visioner falder helt i tråd med disse elitære insideres, de såkaldte fabianske socialister, der fuldstændigt havde fattet, at begrebet socialisme ikke er deres ideologi, men et styresystem af social ingeniørkunst i en global slavestat, med ideologi som opium for folket. Brzezinski er ærligere end disse, for han foregiver aldrig at beskrive andet end netop et blueprint, beskrivelsen af det ønkværdige scenarie. På samme måde som Huntington, der ikke advarer med Clash of Civilisations, men beskriver, hvordan det vil komme (som planlagt). 

Hele snakken om klimaforandringer antager pludselig en helt anden dimension, og her bliver det komplekst. Folk er ikke nået længere end til: Klimaforandringer finder sted, og det er vores skyld, fordi vi udleder CO2 – siger de kloge. De ’kloge’ glemmer at sige, at de har armen på ryggen i en politiseret videnskab, hvor videnskaben er blevet truet og politikerne forført. Så det næste forståelseslag, som folk ikke er ankommet til, er, at klimaforandringer finder sted, men det er ikke vores skyld. Det er kosmiske lovmæssigheder, hvilket aktiverer Johnsons Lov om, at man kan påstå hvad som helst, når blot folk er totalt ubevandrede i et vidensfelt. Her ankommer så det tredje forståelseslag, der vender tilbage til det første på en særdeles modbydelig måde, og nu er de allerfleste stået fuldstændig af. Klimaforandringer kan rent faktisk være menneskeskabte, for via avanceret vejrmodificeringsteknologi kan ’vi’, altså, vi i betydningen ’de’, kunstigt skabe vejret og over tid forandre klimaet. Og det på en temmelig led måde.

Disse folk er ikke dumme. De ved udmærket, at global opvarmning og CO2 blot skaber global frodighed, ellers ville de ikke have brug for et dyrt propagandaapparat og en gigantisk mediekampagne for at overbevise folk, men blot lade videnskaben arbejde færdig og tale ud. Og hvad nu, hvis de rent faktisk planlægger en vejrmodificeret ny istid? Kunstigt vejr er et våben, og husk: i enhver krig er DU den primære fjende. Her vil der for alvor blive lukket ned, og eugenikerne vil kunne klappe i hænderne. Hvilket selvfølgelig er en højoktan-spekulation (Farrells udtryk). Men igen: Brzezinski har givet os al mulig grund til at teoretisere om konspirationer, for hans bog beskriver den slags scenarier, og hans ’profetier’, der selvfølgelig er selvopfyldende, har længe vist sig at gå i opfyldelse al den stund, at det er hans slæng, der har skabt den virkelighed, vi lever i.



Mr. B vidste udmærket, hvad alle de striber skulle på himlen. 

Giv os herefter, misbruger af ordet konspirationsteoretiker, en god grund til, at vi ikke skal teoretisere! Vi har det fra hestens egen mund og ikke fra vores løsslupne politisk ukorrekte fantasi. Fat det, misbruger, og kom nu ind i kampen med et stykke hæderligt hjemmearbejde – hvis du tør!

Den var selvfølgelig ikke til dig, ærede læser, men som du ved, er det den slags afstumpethed, du, vi og jeg er oppe imod. 

Brzezinski siger allerede i 70’erne, inden internettet officielt er udviklet, at folk i fremtiden vil tage deres universitetsstudier via noget, han beskriver som ’nettet’. Visionært eller umuligt? Ikke hvis vi gør os klart, at alle teknologier er udviklet længe før, de bliver implementeret i det offentlige rum.

Vejrmodificeringsteknikker har eksisteret siden sidst i 50’erne. Computere fandtes allerede i 30’erne. UFO-teknologi blev udviklet af nazisterne i 40’erne. Kineserne havde udviklet balistiske missiler for 2000 år siden. Og så går vi ikke engang ind i den præantikke superteknologi tilhørende den fornægtede globale prækultur fra den ’sunkne’ civilisation Ubique, hvor som helst = overalt. Vi nøjes med at konstatere, at nutidens deep-state teknokratiske konstruktører ikke fortæller os, hvad de er i stand til. De nøjes blot med diskret at udøve deres teknologi imod os, mens de udspyr røgslør om aliens for at newage-forvirre os. Jamen, tror du da ikke på aliens fra outer space? Missing the point! Jeg siger ikke, at der ikke findes andre levende intelligente væsener i Universet, der kunne tænkes at komme forbi til en kop kaffe. Jeg siger, at den slags aktivitet, som newage-ufologer observerer og teoretiserer om, har en langt mere ’jordnær’ oprindelse, og at de har frit spil, mens folk ser den anden vej.

Brzezinskis fremsyn, insider eller ej, gør ham til – og vi er nødt til at lægge væmmelsen ved hans kynisme til side for en stund og sige det – en af de mest indflydelsesrige tænkere i det 20. århundrede. Han har bevist tankens kraft, for han har tænkt alle disse ting, og de er blevet til virkelighed. Jamen-jamen, hører jeg i baggrunden, det er også bare fordi, at … NEJ STOP! Objektivt set er han den mest indflydelsesrige tænker i forrige århundrede. Jeg kan ikke lide manden og hans tænkning, ikke ét sekund, men jeg er nødt til at give ham credit for, at han ramte spot-on, og at hans tankesæt desværre fik maksimal indflydelse.



Politisk filosof med indflydelse - på sin vis det modstatte af en skrivebordsfilosof.


Skakspillet

Hans næste bog er The Grand Chess Game. Her bygger han videre på geopolitikkens godfather, Halford MacKinder, og hans udsagn om The Heartland, Verdens Hjerte, den eurasiske landbro mellem Europa og Asien. Besidderen af Verdens Hjerte ejer denne verden. Det bekræfter blot atter en gang, at manualen for vor tid, og specifikt det 20. århundrede, er skrevet af Det Britiske Imperium og dens tænkere. MacKinder har allerede defineret det store skakspil, han kalder det The Great Game – alt er Fucking Great = storslået, når briterne omtaler uhyrligheder, der er i deres favør, The Great War, The Great Famine, The Great Game, The Great Empire. Brzezinski skriver sig ind i denne megalomane angelsaksiske og nu anglo-amerikanske tanketradition. 

The Heartland er intet andet end den livsnerve for udveksling af værdifulde ressourcer, som i gamle dage blev kaldt for Silkeruten. Ressourcerne er i dag andre end fortidens silkevæv, krydderier og ædelstene. Ruten inkluderer nu også Pipeline’istan, ledninger med olie. De inkluderer, desværre, heroin fra De Gyldne Bjerge (Afghanistan) til Vesten (fucking CIA og NATO!). Men de inkluderer også det store nye kinesisk-drevne logistik-projekt med jernbanelinjer fra Sibirien til Europa, det nye Silkeruteprojekt, hvilket betyder, at The Heartland nu bliver genoplivet som et eurasisk projekt og ikke som Halford MacKinder og Zbignew Brzezinski-projekt, med andre ord et vest-globalistisk projekt. Måske var det denne ubekvemme konstatering og ikke hans alt for høje alder, der omsider tog livet af ham?



MacKinder, manden, der skrev manualen til britisk geopolitik. 

Brzezinski siger direkte i 1997, at hvis ikke Vesten kontrollerer The Heartland, bestående af tidligere sovjetiske vassal-stater, vil verden synke sammen i anarki. Interessant, oligarkiets mestertænker definerer selvstyre og frigjorthed fra imperialt overherredømme, som anarki. Sagt på en anden måde: anarki kan altså oversættes med selvstyre. Skal vi så ikke bare kalde det for autokrati eller autonomi i stedet. Skal vi ikke herefter fokusere på begrebet suverænitet i stedet for hele det løsslupne koncept om, at ingen styrer ingen, hvorved alle styrer alle, hvilket svækker den anarkistiske tanke. Vi ønsker uafhængighed af Imperiet, ikke kaos, for pokker! Det bliver helt absurd, hvis vi tager Mr. B’s udsagn alvorligt: Hvis vi ikke SKABER anarki, vil verden synke ned i anarki! 

Der er en grund til, at Brzezinski taler om ideologiernes død. Han er neo-dialektiker. I skakspillet findes der opponerende størrelser af tese-antitese. Der er de gode og de onde, de sorte og de hvide, de røde og de blå. Men hvem er hævet over dette spil af opponenter og antagonister? Det er skakspilleren! Han er syntesen. Brzezinski er faderen til moderne hybrid krigsførelse i den forstand, at han forudsætter en styrende og overseende instans i forhold til det kaos, som krigsførelse – i Kissinger-terminologi balkanisering og konfliktstrategi (strategy of tension) – medfører. Skakspilleren er orden, mens skakbrættet roder i kaos.

I sin bog fra 1997 nævner han alle de koncepter, som karakteriserer det nye årtusind. Krigen mod terror, hybrid krigsførelse, NGO-aktivitet – han var før ude end George Soros med det koncept, der førte til de farvede revolutioner (se Kulturdestruktion og hemmelighedskræmmeri om revolutionismens oprindelse), indholdet fra PNAC-dokumentet om USA’s evige krig baseret på et nyt Pearl Harbor, hvor ethvert udenrigspolitisk eventyr kan legitimeres via en demonstreret trussel. Det er så derfor, verdens stærkeste militærmagt hele tiden bliver truet og angrebet af alle mulige små lande, der ved, at deres lande bliver totalt smadret, ja, det giver fuldstændig mening … Skab en konflikt og du har en krig, en intervention, et statskup, en revolution.



Neo-nazier i Ukraine, der udfører det beskidte arbejde for globalismen. 

Brzezinski nævner i The Grand Chess Board, hvordan Ukraine er livsvigtig for Rusland, og at USA er nødt til at fjerne landet fra den russiske sfære. Altså, i 1997 fortæller han, hvad der skal ske i 2014 – baseret på en viden om, at CIA allerede i 1950’erne havde bragt de sovende celler i form af nazi-fascistgrupper på plads. Ukraine bliver altså en slags Operation Gladio byggende på stay-behind-celler. Han er også faderen bag udtrykket om, at Putin er den ny Hitler. Her taler polakken, der hader både tyskere og russere. C'mon, Mr. B., den slags platte populismer burde være langt under dit niveau!

Den politiske attitude og det verdensbillede er en direkte forlængelse af det Britiske Imperium og dets evige fjender, Tyskland og Rusland. De tror, de kan hive Hitler-kortet op af hatten, hver gang de møder modstand. Kina ser han i starten som en fjende, men senere varmer han op til dem. Muligvis inspireret af sin mentor, Rockefeller, og i erkendelsen af, at de i mellemtiden både er blevet uundværlige og et redskab. Hans primære fokus er, hvordan USA kan skabe den Nye Verdensorden, der selvfølgelig er Imperiets verdensorden (noget nyt her i øvrigt?).  

For eftertiden

På deres gamle dage har disse magtmænd det med at ryste lidt på hånden. For et par år siden kom Brzezinski med en udtalelse om, at der var noget, der bekymrede ham, og som kunne true den Nye Verdensorden. Det var en mulig global og omfattende opvågnen blandt folk. Han beskriver det i sin sidste bog, The Strategic Vision. Det er en direkte respons til internationalisering, hvor man uvægerligt vil komme til at støde en masse mennesker, hvilket vil danne modbevægelser. Han anbefaler, at disse bevægelser bliver undergravet og korrumperet. Det er en af grundene til, at NGO-modellen har skabt så mange redskaber for globalismen, der måske i deres udspring havde en anden og mere humanitær-idealistisk agenda (idealister er nemme at forføre, hvis man vifter med den rigtige klud). Der findes nu manualer med faste procedurer for, hvordan man fx skaber en miljøbevægelse om til grøn fascisme, og hvordan man vender fredelige folkelige oppositioner til voldeligt invasive statskup, ungdomsgrupperinger til hitlerjugend-stil ballademagere (husk BZ’erne og ungdommerne i Kbh), forsmåede demokratiske vælgere til voldsfascister og flygtningestrømme til destruktive invasionshære. De kalder det soft power. Brzezinski ser blot USA’s magtudøvelse som et midlertidigt redskab, da han som dialektiker ved, at verden før eller senere vil vende sig imod dem. Det bekymrer ham dog ikke, for så kan der ske et skift til det egentlige mål: den globale magtudøvelse.




 
Kulturerne, etniciteterne, ideologierne og religionerne vil blive ædt op af korrumperende konsumerisme. Studér blot et udsnit af de forædte højre- eller venstreliberale, der er de sørgelige rester af det 20. århundredes ideologier, så er man ikke i tvivl om, at der ikke er mere at komme efter her. Vi har for længst forladt demokrati og politik, og tilbage er der kun populisme. 

Man kunne gøre en sammenligning mellem de store grå eminenser fra 2. halvdel af det 20. århundrede, Rockefeller, Brzezinski, Kissinger og Soros, og så står i hvert fald Brzezinski ud som en, der ikke var vanvittig glad for det uhellige ægteskab mellem zionisterne og USA, og han har ved flere lejligheder kritiseret AIPAC. Well, han er jo polak, og det er muligvis nogle bekendt, at polakkerne ikke behandlede jøder specielt godt. Dernæst er manden jo ikke dum, så han vidste godt, at den Russiske Revolution, der skabte hans arvefjende, var et zionistisk, khazarisk mafia-projekt. Han rystede også på hovedet af 9/11 og mente ikke, at de fanatiske neocons med dobbelt statsborgerskab, der havde fingrene dybt nede i den svinestreg, gavnede den sag, han arbejdede for – underforstået: han vidste da udmærket, hvad der var foregået, og at det intet havde med al Qaeda at gøre. Altså cmon, manden havde skabt al Qaeda! Han var på mange måder mere intelligent end de oversmarte neocons, og han lod dem lave deres rænkespil, så længe de var nyttige idioter, som i Ukraine. Men den primære årsag var nok, at han som globalist og som en, der troede på ideologiernes bortgang, ikke så hverken den zionistiske ideologi eller israelsk aggressiv nationalisme som velgørende, og kun i den forstand, at de også var både nyttige og idioter, var de til … nytte.




 
Nytteidioti

Problemet med alle slags nyttige idioter, der falder for et forførelsestrick, er, at de på et tidspunkt ikke er nyttige længere, hvorved der skal bruges energi på at afmontere dem. De kører deres eget løb, som duracel-kaniner, og deres løb kan meget vel være uforenligt med forførerens interesser. Det er De Lange Knives Nat -fænomenet, hvor nazisterne var nødt til at skaffe sig af med deres brunskjortede ballademagere, da de havde gjort det beskidte arbejde. USA har haft just det problem med alle deres dårlige venner gennem tiderne, despoter, de har bragt til magten, som de derefter måtte bruge krudt på at omstyrte og evt. likvidere. Vi kommer til at se det med fascisterne i Ukraine, hvis det kommer så langt, og med de bestukne og hyrede terror-horder i Mellemøsten. Det er også gammel britisk taktik. Når først de har udtjent deres funktion, bliver de dumpet, som det garbage, de er. Har man ondt af dem, så? Well … 

En selvsikker type som Netanyahu storpraler af, at det er ham og hans slæng, der har styret showet via terror i årtier, men han glemmer måske, at hans land er en snoldet enklave på skaldede 7 millioner, der bliver holdt kunstigt i live ved at lyve, stjæle og true, og den dag verdensopinionen ikke gider det pjat længere, er det som et knips med en fedtefinger at fjerne dem fra landkortet. I den verdenszionistiske agenda er dette lille lorteland blot en hegnspæl i sandet, og den dag über-zionisterne ikke har brug for dem til at lave ballede i regionen længere, er de out-of-business. Det samme gælder for the House of Saud. Den dag, de har udført deres nyttige idioti i destruktionen af hele regionen ved, som efter planen, af starte en krig med Iran, bliver de dumpet i den første den bedste oliepøl. Som sagt: nyttige idioter er kun nyttige et stykke hen ad vejen. Saudierne har allerede været nyttige i forbindelse med 9/11 ved at ligge og lure som de mistænkte, bin Laden, you know, de manglende sider i 9/11-rapporten say-no-more - selvom der er Mossad-fingeraftryk all fucking over.



Disse israelere mente, at 9/11 var så festlig, at de spontant brød ud i dans midt på gaden.  

Se den anden vej

Hvis Zbigniew kunne læse sine Twitter-feeds fra sit nuværende domicil i Hades, ville han være fornøjet. Westminster Bridge, Manchester og nu London Bridge, lortet virker sgu, hvad sagde jeg, clash of civilisations kører, Brexit, som modstand mod globalismen, kan lammes og aflyses, folk forlanger nu politistaten til at lukke grænser og smide alle fremmede ud! 

Og ja, masseindvandring er ekstrem destruktiv, men det er ikke det, der er pointen. Pointen er, at for at kunne modgå det, kræves der en politistat, hvilket hverken venstre- eller højre-forvirrede er i stand til at øjne. Folk ser nu andre folk som værende problemet, hvilket er by-design-forvirring. Folk er aldrig problemet, for folk finder ud af det med hinanden. Det er folkeforførerne, mind-fuckerne, social-ingeniørerne, der er problemet, men de er så gode til at skjule sig bag skærmen. Hele Brexit-sagen var et eksempel. Folk stemte for udmeldelse i den tro, at det var EU, der var problemet. Og ja, det postdemokratiske, totalitære projekt EU er et stort problem, men nu sidder de tilbage med selve hovedproblemet, som de aldrig har identificeret: deres egen korrupte regering, deres perfide efterretningsvæsen, deres City of London og arvtagerne til det Britiske Imperium, det Perfide Albion. Hvis briterne vil ud af den århundreder gamle suppedas, skal der en noget dybere vækkelse til. 

Tungen ud af halsen

Vi lever i en verden, hvor alting skifter hele tiden. I uddannelsesverdenen taler man om livslang læring (womb-to-tomb) og omstillingsparathed, og jeg skal ikke trætte dig for meget med smarte floskler fra den branche, jeg arbejder i, men blot konstatere, at Mr. Brzezinski minsandten omtaler denne livslange stress-situation som en del af globalisternes agenda. Sådan bliver den futuristiske, teknokratstyrede bystat, befolket med gispende traumatiserede omstillingsparatheder, der løber efter bussen døgnet rundt for at tilpasse sig og please systemet.



PTSD - omstillingsparathed 

Her er vi tilbage til udgangspunktet i Zbigniew Brzezinskis karriere. Hans udgangspunkt i McGill University i Montreal, med alle deres MK-Ultra-studier i traumabaseret sindskontrol. PTSD-fænomenet blev studeret og formuleret i Tavistock Institute i England, en partner til MK-Ultra. De studerede britiske soldater med granatshock og fandt ud af, at disse var meget kontrollerbare grundet deres katatoniske tilstand. Denne erkendelse kunne bruges og udvikles, også i kollektiv skalering. Det er derfor, vi ser så meget terror dukke op, på bemærkelsesværdige tidspunkter. De nylig britiske terrorevents falder lige før et britisk valg, hint-hint.

Om det var Brzezinski eller Rockefeller eller de andre dark-siders, der mest ligner Kejseren fra Star Wars, vil jeg overlade til dig, kære læser. Jeg ser frem til at skrive deres nekromantiske nekrologer om forhåbentlig ikke længe. Vi kan desuden naivt håbe på, at en æra er forbi med bortgangen af disse nekrofile ronkedorer, men der vil uden tvivl være horder af ambitiøst, magtliderligt afskum til at overtage deres plads.  

Lucifers stedfortræder på Jord

Jeg vil ikke tøve med at karakterisere Brzezinskis livsprojekt som ekstremt menneskefjendsk. Jeg vil endog gå så langt som til at kalde det luciferisk. Det er sagt om Lucifer eller Satan – og vi skal ikke her i dag dyrke spidsfindigheder om, hvorvidt disse udtryk dækker over noget væsensforskelligt ej heller dyrke ordet i den Steiner’ske betydning - , at uanset hvor dygtigt, skjult, mangelaget, snedigt, dobbelt bagvendt og forudseende (her har vi netop skakspilleren!), Lucifer agerer, vil han altid agere på en måde, der i sidste ende er uforudsigelig, selv for ham selv, og derved i sidste ende bidrage til noget, der ikke er i hans interesse, men tjener et højere formål.

Så uanset, hvor stor indflydelse, Brzezinski havde på den ondsindede retning, som verden har taget blot i hans livstid, lurer der et element – og jeg tror, han selv var klar over det – af modstand mod det monstrøse projekt. Han holdt selvfølgelig stoneface, og en mand som ham mistede aldrig selvkontrollen og gav efter for emotionelle tendenser. Han lader til det sidste, som om, der er fuld kontrol over hele projektet, og omtaler det i næsten deterministisk eskatologiske vendinger (det sidste ville en ateist som han tage afstand fra), altså: dette her er bare slutspillet, og det vil spille til ende, underforstået: som far her siger.




 
Han var god til at spille kabbalen. Det folkelige udtryk om, at intet er så ondt, at det ikke er godt for noget, har en mere dyster kabbalistisk udgave, der siger: Gud gør det gode med højre hånd og det onde med venstre hånd, og også når vi gør det onde, gør vi Guds vilje. Kabbalister sidestiller simpelthen godt og ondt, simpelthen for at gøre det, som de føler bekvemt. De har ingen moral, for alt er lige godt eller ondt. Relativismen er kabbalistisk. Derfor er globalteknokratiet en vaskeægte kabbalistisk-luciferisk plan om at omskabe den levende verden til en maskine. Hele deres ældgamle projekt går ud på at afkode softwaren, der driver maskinen. Det er en krig mod selve Livet. Joseph P. Farrell, med sit kendskab til disse begrebers rod, har brugt ordet Lucifer-maskinen. Det bliver en meget lang historie om de manglende sten i Lucifers krone, præ-civilisations-krigsteknologi, Lucifer, som et stykke kosmisk software, osv. Men det er just det, der gør teknokrattanken luciferisk. 

Skakmat?

Så vandt eller tabte Mr. Brzezinski sit luciferiske skakspil? Svaret er hverken-eller. For der er stadig brikker på pladen, og Kongen er ikke sat skakmat. Og så er der de skide bønder! Du ved, blot en enkelt bonde, der går hele vejen, kan bringe en død officer tilbage. 

Kineserne opfandt skakspillet, men de opfandt også Go. Amerikanerne tabte Vietnamkrigen, fordi de så det som et skakspil, men nordvietnameserne vandt krigen, fordi de spillede Go, og fordi deres militære leder, general Jiap kendte sin Sun Tsu og vidste, hvordan man med langt færre mænd overvandt en overmægtig fjende ved ikke at spille hans skakspil og aldrig stille op på den bare slagmark i åben kamp.




 
En æra er slut. Brzezinski-doktrinen er klar til at blive begravet sammen med sin skaber, og spillets regler er klar til at forandres. Lucifer troede, at han fik menneskene til at spille sit spil, selv når de troede, at de kæmpede imod, jævnføre al den klichéfyldte snak om kontrolleret opposition, der bruges som defaitistisk standardsvar på alt, der rører sig. Husk dog, at efter en samler kommer x-antal spredere. De gamle ronkedorers achilleshæl er, at de skabte et hof omkring deres egen magtfuldkommenhed, og når deres mindrebegavede arvtagere nu vil falde over egne ben for at kapre deres stol, kommer de uvægerligt til at vælte møblerne og røbe sig selv. Deres desperation er tydelig nok for tiden. Lad dem slås om taburetterne, og lad os holde skarpt øje med dem. 

Let’s enjoy the show. Selvom det nogle gange kan være nemmere sagt end gjort. Og lad os få nogle flere nekrologer.